[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: Community Leadership Calls with Göran Marby
Ephraim Percy Kenyanito
ephraim at article19.org
Mon Feb 7 14:46:44 CET 2022
+1 to Farzi and linking the GPI framework to Human Rights By Law.
--
Best Regards,
Ephraim Percy Kenyanito
Public Policy Specialist/ Regulatory Affairs Specialist/ Project Manager-
International Trade, Technology, Media & Telecommunications Laws
Website: https://ekenyanito.com/
Twitter: @ekenyanito <https://twitter.com/ekenyanito>
PGP Fingerprint: B0FA394AF73DEB7AA1FDC7360CFED26DE6BA8DC1
On 2/7/22 16:42, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> I, of course, support the excellent issues and areas that Farzi is
> raising. NCUC leadership now has a range of issues to raise with
> Goran. Please let us know how the meeting goes!
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 2/6/2022 10:10 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>> Ok thanks Benjamin, I was just having a conversation with Kathy, so
>> you can just relay her question and comment which was supported by
>> Dorothy.
>>
>> In these conversations, first of all it would be good what the CEO
>> wants to talk about too so that we can comment.
>>
>> But conversations can be more fruitful if the answer does not belong
>> to the community but it’s a decision that the CEO and Board take.
>> Chicken and egg problem but something to consider.
>>
>> What I am very interested in knowing more about, is the testing ssad
>> and sub-pro policies when it comes to global public interest. The ODA
>> undertook the exercise which can be found in an appendix:
>> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf#page101
>>
>> I find the method a bit unclear. What is the future plans for GPI?
>> Also as well as GPI toolkit , can we do a human rights impact
>> assessment on these policies? Does the Board have any plans for that?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:02 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>> <benakin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Farzii,
>> I believe these points you have raised are of great concern and
>> deserve the necessary attention.
>> Hopefully, as exchanges continue on these topics we shall make
>> some progress.
>>
>> In order to help others engage here are some trending issues I
>> have compile with links, it will be great to know which one are
>> of interest to members.
>>
>> *Trending ICANN issues*
>>
>>
>> Here are some of the current issues that should be of interest to
>> our community, it is not exhaustive, however it is a good start.
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> SSAD Operation Design Phase
>>
>>
>> ICANN org published theOperational Design Assessment (ODA)
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf>,
>> the final output of the System for Standardized Access/
>> Disclosure (SSAD) to Nonpublic generic Top-Level Domain
>> Registration Data Operational Design Phase (ODP). This marks the
>> closure of the SSAD ODP.
>>
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-delivers-operational-design-assessment-of-ssad-recommendations-25-1-2022-en
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-delivers-operational-design-assessment-of-ssad-recommendations-25-1-2022-en>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Operational Design Phase
>>
>>
>> CANN org announced that planning for the SubPro ODP concluded and
>> that the ODP had begun. The purpose of this ODP, which began on 3
>> January, is to inform the ICANN Board's determination on whether
>> the recommendations are in the best interests of ICANN and the
>> community
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-subsequent-procedures-odp-introducing-the-work-tracks-18-1-2022-en
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-subsequent-procedures-odp-introducing-the-work-tracks-18-1-2022-en>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> Transfer Policy Review
>>
>> PDP around transfer of domain names between registrars.
>>
>> ICANN’s new Transfer Policy , the PDP to replace the
>> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) after a lengthy review
>> of policies that govern gTLD domain transfers
>>
>> https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transfer-policy-review
>> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transfer-policy-review>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> Internationalised Domain Names policy
>>
>> Enabling the secure and stable use of IDNs is crucial to growing
>> a multilingual Internet and digital inclusivity. As stated in
>> ICANN'smission
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article1>,
>> the organization (org) works "to adopt or implement policies or
>> procedures that take into account the use of domain names as
>> natural-language identifiers." In an effort to fulfill this
>> mission, IDNs and Universal Acceptance (UA) are included in
>> ICANN'sStrategic Plan for FY21-25
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2021-2025-24jun19-en.pdf>as
>> well as the ICANN President and CEO'sFY22 goals
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-president-and-ceo-goals-for-fiscal-year-2022-4-10-2021-en>.
>>
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/supporting-a-multilingual-internet-through-idns-icann-idn-progress-report-14-1-2022-en
>> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/supporting-a-multilingual-internet-through-idns-icann-idn-progress-report-14-1-2022-en>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> Global public interest framework
>>
>> Operationalizing the concept of the GPI remains a challenge,
>> despite years of attempts to understand and define it within ICANN.
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit>
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> DNSSEC and DNS Abuse issues
>>
>> https://www.icann.org/dnsabuse <https://www.icann.org/dnsabuse>
>>
>> Help increase global DNSSEC adoption.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:59 PM farzaneh badii
>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am a bit puzzled. New gTLDs have failed even in the first
>> round to meaningfully compete and participate in the market.
>> Community new gtld applications have been marred with
>> objections, GAC warning, and Board going out of its way to
>> listen to what government objections are even when the bylaws
>> didn’t even require it.
>> We have now come up with yet another complex regulatory
>> framework (calling it that on purpose) for the second round
>> and want to ask ICANN to do a campaign for developing
>> underrepresented countries and communities? We haven’t even
>> sorted out the sanctions problems so residents of 6
>> sanctioned countries can’t probably even apply.
>> unfortunately the way these policies are developed and
>> designed will not make the new gtlds more relevant and will
>> not incentivize marginalized communities to participate. On
>> top of that, did we even consider marginalized communities
>> when coming up with all sorts of heavy handed policy criteria
>> for application? I haven’t heard. ICANN campaign will not
>> benefit anybody really but ICANN itself to receive more
>> applications.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:07 PM dorothy g
>> <dgdorothydg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Excellent points Kathy, I hope we can find a way to
>> communicate these if the meeting is now over. The main
>> message is ICANN needs to improve its communications. I
>> had raised the issue of summary briefs to explain the
>> current concerns. 1 page max and these should be translated.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:33 PM Kathy Kleiman
>> <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>> My guess is that this meeting is now finished. For
>> future reference (or if the meeting is yet to come),
>> a topic of concern is how ICANN is preparing to share
>> the opening of the (upcoming) new gTLD application
>> rounds? What marketing efforts is it planning to
>> share the news with regions and indigenous peoples
>> that did not actively participate in the "first
>> round" (2012)?
>>
>> To reach these groups and regions who did not
>> participate before, how much before the application
>> deadline will ICANN roll-out its marketing campaign?
>> How will it target its outreach to these
>> communities? In how many languages will the new gTLD
>> materials be shared? Can we petition for materials
>> to be translated into additional languages if members
>> of (NCSG) want to reach out to communities we know,
>> and whose members may read/speak languages other than
>> the UN 6?
>>
>> Hope it was a good meeting!
>>
>> Kathy
>>
>> On 2/1/2022 4:21 AM, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
>>> Dear NCUC members,
>>> Gentle reminder 😊
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: *Benjamin Akinmoyeje* <benakin at gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:53 PM
>>> Subject: Community Leadership Calls with Göran Marby
>>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear NCUC members,
>>> Happy New Year to you again and I hope you are doing
>>> great.
>>>
>>> I am writing to you to seek suggestions on topics of
>>> interest you want me to discuss with the ICANN CEO
>>> when we meet on February 1st 2022..
>>>
>>> I look forward to hearing from you and the topics
>>> you want me to discuss with him.
>>> Your timely response will be highly appreciated.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Benjamin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> stay well, kind regards
>> Dorothy Gordon
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> --
>> Farzaneh
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> --
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> --
> Kathy Kleiman
> President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20220207/7943f82a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list