[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: Community Leadership Calls with Göran Marby
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at dnrc.tech
Mon Feb 7 14:42:55 CET 2022
I, of course, support the excellent issues and areas that Farzi is
raising. NCUC leadership now has a range of issues to raise with
Goran. Please let us know how the meeting goes!
Best, Kathy
On 2/6/2022 10:10 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Ok thanks Benjamin, I was just having a conversation with Kathy, so
> you can just relay her question and comment which was supported by
> Dorothy.
>
> In these conversations, first of all it would be good what the CEO
> wants to talk about too so that we can comment.
>
> But conversations can be more fruitful if the answer does not belong
> to the community but it’s a decision that the CEO and Board take.
> Chicken and egg problem but something to consider.
>
> What I am very interested in knowing more about, is the testing ssad
> and sub-pro policies when it comes to global public interest. The ODA
> undertook the exercise which can be found in an appendix:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf#page101
>
> I find the method a bit unclear. What is the future plans for GPI?
> Also as well as GPI toolkit , can we do a human rights impact
> assessment on these policies? Does the Board have any plans for that?
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:02 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Farzii,
> I believe these points you have raised are of great concern and
> deserve the necessary attention.
> Hopefully, as exchanges continue on these topics we shall make
> some progress.
>
> In order to help others engage here are some trending issues I
> have compile with links, it will be great to know which one are of
> interest to members.
>
> *Trending ICANN issues*
>
>
> Here are some of the current issues that should be of interest to
> our community, it is not exhaustive, however it is a good start.
>
>
> *
>
> SSAD Operation Design Phase
>
>
> ICANN org published theOperational Design Assessment (ODA)
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssad-oda-25jan22-en.pdf>,
> the final output of the System for Standardized Access/ Disclosure
> (SSAD) to Nonpublic generic Top-Level Domain Registration Data
> Operational Design Phase (ODP). This marks the closure of the SSAD
> ODP.
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-delivers-operational-design-assessment-of-ssad-recommendations-25-1-2022-en
> <https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-delivers-operational-design-assessment-of-ssad-recommendations-25-1-2022-en>
>
>
> *
>
> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Operational Design Phase
>
>
> CANN org announced that planning for the SubPro ODP concluded and
> that the ODP had begun. The purpose of this ODP, which began on 3
> January, is to inform the ICANN Board's determination on whether
> the recommendations are in the best interests of ICANN and the
> community
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-subsequent-procedures-odp-introducing-the-work-tracks-18-1-2022-en
> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-subsequent-procedures-odp-introducing-the-work-tracks-18-1-2022-en>
>
>
> *
>
> Transfer Policy Review
>
> PDP around transfer of domain names between registrars.
>
> ICANN’s new Transfer Policy , the PDP to replace the
> Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) after a lengthy review of
> policies that govern gTLD domain transfers
>
> https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transfer-policy-review
> <https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/transfer-policy-review>
>
>
> *
>
> Internationalised Domain Names policy
>
> Enabling the secure and stable use of IDNs is crucial to growing a
> multilingual Internet and digital inclusivity. As stated in
> ICANN'smission
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article1>,
> the organization (org) works "to adopt or implement policies or
> procedures that take into account the use of domain names as
> natural-language identifiers." In an effort to fulfill this
> mission, IDNs and Universal Acceptance (UA) are included in
> ICANN'sStrategic Plan for FY21-25
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2021-2025-24jun19-en.pdf>as
> well as the ICANN President and CEO'sFY22 goals
> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/icann-president-and-ceo-goals-for-fiscal-year-2022-4-10-2021-en>.
>
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/supporting-a-multilingual-internet-through-idns-icann-idn-progress-report-14-1-2022-en
> <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/supporting-a-multilingual-internet-through-idns-icann-idn-progress-report-14-1-2022-en>
>
>
> *
>
> Global public interest framework
>
> Operationalizing the concept of the GPI remains a challenge,
> despite years of attempts to understand and define it within ICANN.
>
> https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit
> <https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit>
>
>
> *
>
> DNSSEC and DNS Abuse issues
>
> https://www.icann.org/dnsabuse <https://www.icann.org/dnsabuse>
>
> Help increase global DNSSEC adoption.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 5:59 PM farzaneh badii
> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am a bit puzzled. New gTLDs have failed even in the first
> round to meaningfully compete and participate in the market.
> Community new gtld applications have been marred with
> objections, GAC warning, and Board going out of its way to
> listen to what government objections are even when the bylaws
> didn’t even require it.
> We have now come up with yet another complex regulatory
> framework (calling it that on purpose) for the second round
> and want to ask ICANN to do a campaign for developing
> underrepresented countries and communities? We haven’t even
> sorted out the sanctions problems so residents of 6 sanctioned
> countries can’t probably even apply.
> unfortunately the way these policies are developed and
> designed will not make the new gtlds more relevant and will
> not incentivize marginalized communities to participate. On
> top of that, did we even consider marginalized communities
> when coming up with all sorts of heavy handed policy criteria
> for application? I haven’t heard. ICANN campaign will not
> benefit anybody really but ICANN itself to receive more
> applications.
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:07 PM dorothy g
> <dgdorothydg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Excellent points Kathy, I hope we can find a way to
> communicate these if the meeting is now over. The main
> message is ICANN needs to improve its communications. I
> had raised the issue of summary briefs to explain the
> current concerns. 1 page max and these should be translated.
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 7:33 PM Kathy Kleiman
> <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> My guess is that this meeting is now finished. For
> future reference (or if the meeting is yet to come), a
> topic of concern is how ICANN is preparing to share
> the opening of the (upcoming) new gTLD application
> rounds? What marketing efforts is it planning to
> share the news with regions and indigenous peoples
> that did not actively participate in the "first round"
> (2012)?
>
> To reach these groups and regions who did not
> participate before, how much before the application
> deadline will ICANN roll-out its marketing campaign?
> How will it target its outreach to these communities?
> In how many languages will the new gTLD materials be
> shared? Can we petition for materials to be
> translated into additional languages if members of
> (NCSG) want to reach out to communities we know, and
> whose members may read/speak languages other than the
> UN 6?
>
> Hope it was a good meeting!
>
> Kathy
>
> On 2/1/2022 4:21 AM, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
>> Dear NCUC members,
>> Gentle reminder 😊
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: *Benjamin Akinmoyeje* <benakin at gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 6:53 PM
>> Subject: Community Leadership Calls with Göran Marby
>> To: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>
>>
>> Dear NCUC members,
>> Happy New Year to you again and I hope you are doing
>> great.
>>
>> I am writing to you to seek suggestions on topics of
>> interest you want me to discuss with the ICANN CEO
>> when we meet on February 1st 2022..
>>
>> I look forward to hearing from you and the topics you
>> want me to discuss with him.
>> Your timely response will be highly appreciated.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Benjamin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> --
>
> stay well, kind regards
> Dorothy Gordon
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> --
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
--
Kathy Kleiman
President, Domain Name Rights Coalition
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20220207/5febcf74/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list