[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Important] About your membership

[Claire Craig]

Thanks for this important information. I have read it, but I'm looking
forward to see some of the questions that were raised and to see the
responses.

CCC

On 5 March 2018 at 18:50, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all
>
> This is an important notice by NCSG Chair.
>
> Some of you have already read it carefully and sent me questions and
> I'll answer them all publicly as well soon.
>
> Please keep sending any questions you may have and rest assured you
> will receive guidance without any fear.
>
> You can also contact your EC if you prefer.
>
> Thank you
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> Date: 2018-03-02 19:29 GMT-03:00
> Subject: [Important] About your membership
> To: NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>
>
> Dear members,
>
> NCSG members cannot be a member of another GNSO Stakeholder Group.
> They also cannot represent their government on GAC and be a member of
> NCSG at the same time. This is not the case with ALAC and At-large, as
> long as you have a non-commercial interest in ICANN and not
> represented in other ICANN GNSO groups, you can become a member of
> NCSG.
>
> Upon applying to join NCSG you come across the statement below:
>
> "I am an Individual Internet user who is primarily concerned with the
> public interest aspects of domain name policy and I am not represented
> in ICANN through membership in another Supporting Organization or GNSO
> Stakeholder Group."
>
> The above statement should not change throughout your membership. This
> means that if you have joined the commercial stakeholder group or
> another stakeholder group at GNSO, you should inform me immediately
> and either resign from NCSG or resign from the other group. Again,
> this does not include At-Large and ALAC, as long as you keep the
> noncommercial nature of your activities, you can be a member of both
> At-large and NCSG. Also, advisory committees that have a technical
> nature such as RSSAC and SSAC might not be problematic either.
>
>
> We will make these points more clear with the help of NCSG-EC in the
> near future. If you have doubts, please do not hesitate to contact me
> for more clarification.
>
> Best
>
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180306/2d31f784/attachment.html>