[NCUC-DISCUSS] IGF 2018 Workshop Proposal Submitted

[Ayden Férdeline]

Hi Renata,

What were the "time constraints"? The proposal submission deadline that was known two months in advance?

The archives seem incomplete and often refer to taking conversations off-list. How frequently does this happen, and how does the Executive Committee reach the decision to take a conversation offline and away from membership review? Do these off-list conversations happen behind a closed archive, or through another medium?

Thank you,

Ayden

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 19:51, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all All the processes done by the Executive Committee can be followed up on our open archives list https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec Any work passed on this list for membership review is collective work and can receive inputs up to when the proposal is finalized. Indeed the proposal could have been sent with more time but the EC was alerted that there were time constraints and voted for it knowingly. This proposal received majority of the EC and (should it be approved) members can still make suggestions up to the day of the presentation. NCUC remains open for suggestion from members on actions and projects that help us focus back on policy work done in ICANN. Best, Renata _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss mailing list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180607/c69b7d91/attachment.html>