[NCUC-DISCUSS] Call for volunteers to comment on the 1st Finance Committee Operational Procedures draft (OP)

[Remmy Nweke]

Hi Bruna
Confusion understood now. Do accept my apologies if you read any extraneous
meaning into my response. It was meant to demean your purpose or anyone
else but stressing the fact that we all need to collaborate as anyone of us
is qualified to be in Finance Committee in our own rights and jointly move
NCSG FC forward.
Nice day.
Remmy

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:57 PM Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Remmy,
>
> I am not here to pursue any mischiefs or to paint anyone in any colours.
> My e-mail was a mistake and as soon as I realized It I emailed the list.
>
> So I think you guys can assume I was acting in good faith in same way I
> have been assuming the FC has been acting on, because we all work together
> and the Idea here is not to foster any disputes but to come up with the
> best operating procedures possible.
>
> Cheers,
> Bruna
>
> Em qua, 18 de jul de 2018 06:09, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Dear  Farzaneh and Bruna,
>> I really did not know what Farzaneh meant here because this seems to me
>> as looking for excuses.
>>
>> You had brought this issue earlier and I reworked the document afresh. It
>> all arose from the fact that I resaved without accompanying comments.this
>> was corrected when my attention was drawn to it in the V1B document and I
>> urged us to use this as most current and requested further comments, but
>> you did not respond to that before it was shared for community comment by
>> FC chairman.
>>
>> What I did as the penholder after you unilaterally removed it and
>> eventually return access was to rework the document afresh and requested if
>> there is any other thing based on the comments you made, especially on
>> obligation. I also explained that I did not resolve issues I am not sure of
>> was resolved that is why you can see unresolved comments.
>>
>> So using it as an excuse here is trying to paint the FC and myself in bad
>> colour, which invariably you have succeeded in doing because I just saw the
>> note from Bruna, which is not the fact. It's a mischief to say the least
>> and I do not think that will get NCSG or FC anywhere.
>>
>> Creating such an impression is too inimical for any success, please let's
>> be guided. I am not aware this FC is interested in fighting anyone or
>> group, but to contribute it's quota in repositioning NCSG FC, pure and
>> simple.
>>
>> If you have any concern do bring them on, the Operating Procedures (OP)
>> for NCSG-FC is not and cannot be exclusive to the current FC and is meant
>> to live much beyond it. Undue allegations as raised in your mail is
>> uncalled for and can best be described as diversion.
>>
>> I will reiterate once again that frustrating FC as an agenda by anyone
>> will not help NCSG strengthen its processes and it's important we get over
>> the teething challenges beyond individual human ego, rather it leaves a lot
>> of suspicions and I am very sure this current FC is not focusing on and
>> will likely not focus on as far as I am concerned.
>>
>> Best of the day
>> Remmy
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:35 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remmy and Thato
>>>
>>> Since for many of the points I raised on the doc, the penholder did not
>>> come up with any compromise, nor remove the language and or just pose the
>>> issues as questions to be responded to later and kept the original language
>>> and it now posted on the list, and since my suggestion for inviting those
>>> who drafted the charter to tell us about the obligations of FC and the
>>> meaning of the charter is being rejected I have to post the link to the
>>> documents with all the comments that were not resolved. I can't argue more
>>> than 10 times over one point.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xUEOsE5Ju4ZnmJKK3M43cHWltrElt1W5YPy2LOaT9r4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:28 AM James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NCSG is not NCUC+NPOC, these are three separate entities, myself and
>>>> others have tried to impress this open the FC for 2 weeks with no change in
>>>> your position.
>>>> Until this distinction is understood these OP cannot be approved as
>>>> their baseline is incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Jul 2018, at 14:27, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have copied  and pasted below a part of the charter under Section 2.6
>>>> outside the charge for FC to account for all funds received by NCSG (NPOC
>>>> and NCUC).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>> --
>> Remmy Nweke, Esq lead strategist/group executive editor, DigitalSENSE
>> Africa Media Ltd, publishers of: [DigitalSENSE Business News | ITRealms |
>> NaijaAgroNet] Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza Bolade Junction,
>> Oshodi, Lagos-Nigeria 234-8023122558, 8051000475, 08033592762, 08172004283
>> Remmyn at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
> --
Remmy Nweke, Esq lead strategist/group executive editor, DigitalSENSE
Africa Media Ltd, publishers of: [DigitalSENSE Business News | ITRealms |
NaijaAgroNet] Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza Bolade Junction,
Oshodi, Lagos-Nigeria 234-8023122558, 8051000475, 08033592762, 08172004283
Remmyn at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180718/2bd001c2/attachment.html>