[NCUC-DISCUSS] Call for volunteers to comment on the 1st Finance Committee Operational Procedures draft (OP)

[Thato Mfikwe]

Hi Bruna,

Your correction on your previous email is well appreciated and I fully
agree to the notion of having the best FC OP possible. Yes, collaboration
is key to all our activities, thanks.

Thato Mfikwe.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Remmy,
>
> I am not here to pursue any mischiefs or to paint anyone in any colours.
> My e-mail was a mistake and as soon as I realized It I emailed the list.
>
> So I think you guys can assume I was acting in good faith in same way I
> have been assuming the FC has been acting on, because we all work together
> and the Idea here is not to foster any disputes but to come up with the
> best operating procedures possible.
>
> Cheers,
> Bruna
>
> Em qua, 18 de jul de 2018 06:09, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Dear  Farzaneh and Bruna,
>> I really did not know what Farzaneh meant here because this seems to me
>> as looking for excuses.
>>
>> You had brought this issue earlier and I reworked the document afresh. It
>> all arose from the fact that I resaved without accompanying comments.this
>> was corrected when my attention was drawn to it in the V1B document and I
>> urged us to use this as most current and requested further comments, but
>> you did not respond to that before it was shared for community comment by
>> FC chairman.
>>
>> What I did as the penholder after you unilaterally removed it and
>> eventually return access was to rework the document afresh and requested if
>> there is any other thing based on the comments you made, especially on
>> obligation. I also explained that I did not resolve issues I am not sure of
>> was resolved that is why you can see unresolved comments.
>>
>> So using it as an excuse here is trying to paint the FC and myself in bad
>> colour, which invariably you have succeeded in doing because I just saw the
>> note from Bruna, which is not the fact. It's a mischief to say the least
>> and I do not think that will get NCSG or FC anywhere.
>>
>> Creating such an impression is too inimical for any success, please let's
>> be guided. I am not aware this FC is interested in fighting anyone or
>> group, but to contribute it's quota in repositioning NCSG FC, pure and
>> simple.
>>
>> If you have any concern do bring them on, the Operating Procedures (OP)
>> for NCSG-FC is not and cannot be exclusive to the current FC and is meant
>> to live much beyond it. Undue allegations as raised in your mail is
>> uncalled for and can best be described as diversion.
>>
>> I will reiterate once again that frustrating FC as an agenda by anyone
>> will not help NCSG strengthen its processes and it's important we get over
>> the teething challenges beyond individual human ego, rather it leaves a lot
>> of suspicions and I am very sure this current FC is not focusing on and
>> will likely not focus on as far as I am concerned.
>>
>> Best of the day
>> Remmy
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:35 PM farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Remmy and Thato
>>>
>>> Since for many of the points I raised on the doc, the penholder did not
>>> come up with any compromise, nor remove the language and or just pose the
>>> issues as questions to be responded to later and kept the original language
>>> and it now posted on the list, and since my suggestion for inviting those
>>> who drafted the charter to tell us about the obligations of FC and the
>>> meaning of the charter is being rejected I have to post the link to the
>>> documents with all the comments that were not resolved. I can't argue more
>>> than 10 times over one point.
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xUEOsE5Ju4ZnmJKK3M43cHWltrElt
>>> 1W5YPy2LOaT9r4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:28 AM James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> NCSG is not NCUC+NPOC, these are three separate entities, myself and
>>>> others have tried to impress this open the FC for 2 weeks with no change in
>>>> your position.
>>>> Until this distinction is understood these OP cannot be approved as
>>>> their baseline is incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> On 17 Jul 2018, at 14:27, Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have copied  and pasted below a part of the charter under Section 2.6
>>>> outside the charge for FC to account for all funds received by NCSG (NPOC
>>>> and NCUC).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>> --
>> Remmy Nweke, Esq lead strategist/group executive editor, DigitalSENSE
>> Africa Media Ltd, publishers of: [DigitalSENSE Business News | ITRealms |
>> NaijaAgroNet] Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza Bolade Junction,
>> Oshodi, Lagos-Nigeria 234-8023122558, 8051000475, 08033592762, 08172004283
>> Remmyn at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20180718/1e160afc/attachment.html>