[NCUC-DISCUSS] Domain Incite: ICANN declines to disclose whether it pays men and women the same.

[Michael Karanicolas]

Thanks very much for sharing Bruna.

>From a transparency perspective, this is very troubling - particularly
the response to #2, which is an absurd reading of the DIDP. The idea
that because ICANN doesn't specifically track salaries by gender, that
means that "there is no documentary information in ICANN org’s
possession, custody or control that is responsive to this request" is
nonsensical. They clearly have that information, and could very easily
calculate it.

I would be interested to see this challenged through the appeal
mechanism - since if that's their interpretation of how the DIDP
works, it's utility going forward is going to be incredibly limited,
even with proper implementation of the WS2 recommendations.

Michael



On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
<bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Just seen on Domain Incite's twitter: The Centre for Internet & Society
> filled a DIPD relating to the income of ICANN [organization] employees,
> questioning the metrics for employees salaries and the average salary of a
> female employee at ICANN and what is the average salary of a male employee
> at ICANN at each of these brackets, between other questions.
>
> The answer can be seen here:
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180525-1-kurian-response-23jun18-en.pdf
>
>
> Best,
> --
> Bruna Martins dos Santos
>
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>