[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Request for Comment] NCUC meeting with GAC

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

Themes where there isn't much agreement can still be discussed and brought
to light, if not one unanimous opinion, the range of comments.

However, it does seems that with 3 sessions about a theme on schedule it
looks like the GAC wants to do most of the talking. Maybe just following
the debate and making a point that civil society is also there and not
speaking, or not being a part of the dialogue, is also quite strong.

Best,

Renata

Em 19 de out de 2017 7:36 AM, "William Drake" <wjdrake at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi
>
> I could be wrong, but would suspect that the GAC might want to hear from
> civil society as to what we think about Amazon and jurisdiction, which are
> likely to loom large in AD.  If so it might make sense for us to consider
> what kind of messaging we might provide, especially since we’ve never had
> much agreement on the former.
>
> Bill
>
> > On Oct 16, 2017, at 13:05, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > A few points
> >
> > - 3 GAC meetings on Amazon and one on "Any Future"
> >
> > I think this is an all time record.
> >
> > Side note for a request to have a meeting on "Any Future" too.
> > Accept "Utopia/Distopia" as alternate
> >
> > GAC Meeting with Amazon.com
> >
> > GAC discussion on Amazon IRP (1)
> >
> > GAC discussion on Amazon IRP (2)
> >
> > GAC Working Group to Examine the Protection of Geographic Names in any
> > Future Expansion of gTLDs Meeting
> >
> > - Underserved region
> >
> > It would be good to talk to the GAC about the Underserved Regions WG
> > Gov reps from many countries were flown in for the workshop in Abu
> > Dhabi on the 28oct. Now listed as
> >
> > "Capacity Development Workshop for Middle East GAC Members"
> >
> > There is likely to be another in Panama
> >
> > I've requested multiple times to be a part of their list as NCUC focal
> > point on underserved regions, no reply so far
> >
> > I would like to know how the dialogue w/ civil society is evolving on
> > this program and how these gov members enroll
> >
> > It looks to me as there could be a risk of the underserved regions
> > debaters being people who have no connection to the topic
> >
> > I bet most underserved regions would have suggestions on people to join
> this
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20171020/93c1c85a/attachment.html>