[NCUC-DISCUSS] Cross Community Discussion/ Geographic Names at the Top Level Session II

[Farell Folly]

Dear Farzaneh,

You are totally right.. I attended the 1st meeting few days ago and I will
attend the one of the afternoon. Discussions are very serious. I would like
to work on that.



Regards
@__f_f__

Computer Security | Internet of Things
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________.
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 29 juin 2017 10:21, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> I think as the noncommercial group we have not paid enough attention to
> the issue of Geographic names at the top level.By claiming sovereignty over
> Geo names, governments will claim the Geo names. If we do not wake up and
> get active, we will not be able to rescue the generic names that happen to
> be Geo names as well.
>
>
> Today there will be a cross-community session and they will discuss
> various important issues but some of the questions are important and I
> recommend NCUC members attend the session. I have attached the agenda and
> some of the questions that will be addressed are copied below:
>
> 17:00 Key Geo Names Issues to Address in the PDP
>
> 1. What makes a string a “geographic name”?
>
> 2. When can a geographic name:
>
> ● Be applied for;
>
> ● Be delegated to a particular applicant?
>
> 3. If there are simultaneous applications for a geographic name, how
> should this be
>
> resolved?
>
> 4. How could “geographic use” be distinguished from “generic use”?
>
> 5. How can commitments to restrict a TLD to non-geographic use be
> monitored and enforced?
>
> Best
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170629/f170cf14/attachment-0002.html>