[NCUC-DISCUSS] Nomcom

[Farell Folly]

I agree with Tapani on this point. There is no need to hide such kind of
decision to the rest of the group. If we (the group) had voted before to
conduct it  this way, that is fine, otherwise it is not fair for the
candidates or to the members to discover some rules or criteria once the
results are announced.

If we cannot afford for  such kind of transparency  at our level we can't
 ask ICANN to be more transparent  on its high level decision  either.

Personally  I think, if  everyone knows the selections criteria and what
vote/note/grade/mark was given by who (from EC) to who (candidate) the
results would more straightforward and not subject to too much discussion.

Regards
@__f_f__
https://www.linkedin.com/in/farellf
________________________________
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 31 juil. 2017 9:47 AM, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> While I'm happy to see two great candidates and good discussion
> about NomCom, there's one side issue I find disconcerting, namely
> how NCUC EC plans to make its decision.
>
> I may have misunderstood something, but looking at
>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-July/004061.html
>
> it seems they plan to discuss this in private emails.
>
> Transparency is one of our core values, moving EC deliberations to
> private emails is something that should not be done lightly if at all,
> certainly not without some extraordinary justification. I would very
> much hate to see it become normal, routine procedure whenever EC or
> the Chair feel like it.
>
> There may well be circumstances where confidential discussions are
> needed, but they should be rare, explicitly justified and documented,
> and even then they should still be recorded and records kept somewhere
> where they can be accessed, e.g., by the Ombudsman if need be.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170731/025bea21/attachment-0002.html>