[NCUC-DISCUSS] A problem in registration form for ICANN60 Abu Dhabi

Renata Aquino Ribeiro raquino at gmail.com
Mon Jul 17 13:14:01 CEST 2017


Hi Rafik

Thank you for correcting

Still have to say:

What if there are ppl. who want to say "other" or "i dont want to say"?

What if there are those who want to use PGP - Preferred Gender Pronoun?

Just the fact that these are "problems" is disheartening

Think were this "data problem" will end up makes one want not to fill these
forms altogether. Or just participate in ICANN at all.

No community, no "problem".

Em 17/07/2017 05:13, "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Renata,
>
> my understanding is that is not related to local hosts request. the
> question is on the registration site which was also used for other ICANN
> meetings. the ombudsman was not involved directly but heard that concerns
> were raised to "registration" and/or meeting team. The question is already
> removed from the page. the ombudsman is going to discuss with registration
> team to know more.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-07-17 9:12 GMT+09:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I have just read the raw transcript of the last WS2-Diversity meeting
>>
>> Meeting page
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66089058
>>
>> Raw transcript
>>
>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66089058/DI
>> VERSITY%20SUBGROUP%20MEETING%20_07132017-FINAL-en.pdf?
>> version=1&modificationDate=1500220959000&api=v2
>>
>> The raw transcript means it is the 1st form of the transcript, no
>> corrections
>>
>> But what I read made me caught my attention enough to share this on the
>> lists
>>
>> Especially giving the discussion about reviewing where meetings happen
>>
>> Apparently there was a "concern" with registration to ICANN60 because
>> "a form" presented the follow question and options of response
>>
>> Gender:  Male/Female/Other
>>
>> The "other" option raised the "concern" and ombudsman brought up that
>> this was the theme of a conversation w/ local organization
>>
>> So what would happen if ICANN had, let's say, a number of
>> registrations of "Other" ?
>>
>> Would this be theme for other conversations between ombudsman and
>> local organizers?
>>
>> Are there any data collected by registration form that would cause
>> "concern" to local organizers?
>>
>> And sorry about the extensive use of quote marks. The words are a bit
>> surprising and I tried to soften the blow.
>>
>> Renata
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170717/350c329d/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list