[NCUC-DISCUSS] A problem in registration form for ICANN60 Abu Dhabi

[James Gannon]

I think a lot of people would agree with that, but there are a number of people who have been pushing for ICANN to collect an insane amount of personal infomratino on the grounds of diversity statistics so we might find pushback on that.

From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Järvi
Sent: 17 July 2017 07:30
To: Cedric Laurant <cedric at laurant.org>
Cc: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] A problem in registration form for ICANN60 Abu Dhabi

I personally suggest removing the gender field completely. It’s irrelevant information.

Jesse





Jesse Mikael Järvi

IT Consultant

Email: me at jessejarvi.net<mailto:me at jessejarvi.net>

Phone: +358 400 401020

LinkedIn: Jesse Mikael Järvi<https://linkedin.com/in/jessejarvi>



On Jul 17, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Cedric Laurant <cedric at laurant.org<mailto:cedric at laurant.org>> wrote:
It is indeed irrelevant for the purpose of a public event registration.
What might be relevant is how people want to be addressed in
correspondence or in panels. It would therefore be sufficient to add a
field with "Mr"/"Mrs"/"Dr", etc.
Cédric

On 7/17/17 12:18 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:

We might want to lobby to change the "Other" selection to
"don't want to say" or "irrelevant" something to that effect
and then all select that.

Even better would be to get rid of the question altogether
on grounds that it is irrelevant.

Tapani


On Jul 16 21:12, Renata Aquino Ribeiro (raquino at gmail.com<mailto:raquino at gmail.com>) wrote:

Hello

I have just read the raw transcript of the last WS2-Diversity meeting

Meeting page

https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=66089058

Raw transcript

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66089058/DIVERSITY%20SUBGROUP%20MEETING%20_07132017-FINAL-en.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500220959000&api=v2

The raw transcript means it is the 1st form of the transcript, no corrections

But what I read made me caught my attention enough to share this on the lists

Especially giving the discussion about reviewing where meetings happen

Apparently there was a "concern" with registration to ICANN60 because
"a form" presented the follow question and options of response

Gender:  Male/Female/Other

The "other" option raised the "concern" and ombudsman brought up that
this was the theme of a conversation w/ local organization

So what would happen if ICANN had, let's say, a number of
registrations of "Other" ?

Would this be theme for other conversations between ombudsman and
local organizers?

Are there any data collected by registration form that would cause
"concern" to local organizers?

And sorry about the extensive use of quote marks. The words are a bit
surprising and I tried to soften the blow.

Renata
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

--
Cédric Laurant
Global Data Privacy Attorney & Public Policy Expert
(http://cedriclaurant.com)
Attorney at Law (District of Columbia Bar, USA) - Abogado | CIPM,
CIPP/US, CIPP/E, FIP
Cedric at Laurant.org<mailto:Cedric at Laurant.org> (**)
(**) GPG: 347F F3D6 DBE5 8075 5B2C E093 1FEC 5AC6 220B 2548 (Download:
http://tinyurl.com/email-cedric)

_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170717/fcfd85f5/attachment-0002.html>