[NCUC-DISCUSS] Meeting with ICANN CEO

[Mueller, Milton L]

I don’t see the point of the first three questions. They refer to past actions and the only affect I can see them having is putting the CEO on the defensive for no good reason. I do think the 4th question is suitable, and points forward to constructive actions that we both could take

Dr. Milton L Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy<http://spp.gatech.edu/>
Georgia Institute of Technology
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org/

Ninety seven American hi tech companies signed an amicus brief supporting the State of Washington's lawsuit against United States President Donald Trump ( http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/business/amicus-brief-by-tech-companies/2322/ ) and his travel ban.

ICANN is an American high tech corporation impacted by the ban.

Did:

1. ICANN consider joining with its fellow American hi tech companies in signing onto this brief?,
2. If so, why did it decide not to do so?
3. If not, why not?
4. Does the CEO agree that the travel ban has serious repercussions  for ICANN? If so, what does ICANN intend to do, if anything,  to mitigate the harm this ban is causing and potentially will, if extended, continue to cause ICANN corporate and community?

Thanks for considering,

Ed Morris



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20170206/e41b6656/attachment-0002.html>