[NCUC-DISCUSS] GNSO Standing Selection Committee Changes

[Johan Helsingius]

Renata,

There were some very heated discussions in the working group that
put together the current SSC charter. Some SOs/constituencies
insisted on the consensus in order to approve some of the
other points.

	Julf


On 11-12-17 14:30, Renata Aquino Ribeiro wrote:
> Hi Rafik, Poncelet
> 
> GNSO SSC is going through a charter review
> 
> I thought I hear your comments on the following poitns
> 
> Two major review points
> 
> - SSC currently works via unanimous consensus
> There was a suggestion to change this to majority
> So far, the SSC has been succesful in reaching consensus
> Chair and vice-chair suggested this be maintained
> I am not sure how to go here.
> We have had situations where it was a tough decision. I have held my
> position, for instance, that underrepresented candidate pool have
> different weighing - like women and underserved regions. This view is
> not always shared by other SSC members, despite it being on charter
> that we also have to observe diversty.
> What do you think of this?
> 
> - Announcement of deliberation results
> The announcement of SSC deliberation results currently is made public
> before it is presented to GSNO Council to be confirmed.
> There was a suggestion that this announcement be delayed once GNSO
> Council confirms candidates.
> This seems straightforward but what if we have a situation where SSC
> and GNSO Council do not concur?
> Will this difference be made public?
> Will SSC be consulted again?
> 
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>