[NCUC-DISCUSS] Session on termination of domains for hate speech at ICANN 60

James Gannon james at cyberinvasion.net
Sun Aug 20 18:29:36 CEST 2017


Be very careful here guys, the minute that this session is rebranded as why the NCUC thinks that Nazis should have been left online, which is exactly how this session will be branded by the alt-right, is the minute you will see half of your membership resign, myself included.

-James

-----Original Message-----
From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: 20 August 2017 17:06
To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Session on termination of domains for hate speech at ICANN 60

That's great, Niels, but I think it is also a very important session for NCUC to have as well (NCUC and/or NCSG).  There are a range of pending policy issues -- in ICANN and just outside of ICANN -- that we need not only to discuss, but to start formulating plans and strategies.

Termination of domain names -- via lack of due process, private copyright law and private trademark law -- are all very much issues that the Noncommercial Community needs to be ready for in statements, comments and positions to come.  The more we work on this issue the better.

BTW, these are issues -- especially termination of domain names without due process -- that go back to the very founding of the NCUC and our earliest work on the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy  (UDRP) which was "consensus policy #1" in ICANN. We fought for a policy grounded in intellectual property laws **and legal protections for free expression and due process.** With so many similar issues now on the table, this is our NCUC moment to continue to serve as the conscience of ICANN.

Best, Kathy


On 8/20/2017 3:36 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Perhaps we can probably make some time in the CCWP HR / human rights 
> session for this? Would that work for people?
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
> On 08/19/2017 02:16 PM, Ayden FĂ©rdeline wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In case it is helpful, please find attached the preliminary block 
>> schedule for ICANN 60.
>>
>> It is really a shame we cannot have this discussion as a 
>> cross-community High Interest Topic at ICANN 60. I think that would 
>> be the best place for this dialogue to take place. Nonetheless, I 
>> count myself among those who would welcome this conversation taking place on Constituency Day.
>>
>> And Jeremy, thanks for sharing that excellent statement on content 
>> removal and noting what a blunt instrument the suspension of a domain 
>> name is. Freedom of expression is a fundamental human right. You 
>> don't take human rights away from people just because you hate them 
>> or their views. It's kind of shocking to me how quickly some have 
>> been to throw these fundamental principles of liberalism into the bonfire.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden FĂ©rdeline
>> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Session on termination of domains for 
>>> hate speech at ICANN 60 Local Time: 19 August 2017 3:49 AM UTC Time: 
>>> 19 August 2017 02:49
>>> From: dave at davecake.net
>>> To: Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org> ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>
>>> I would support this discussion taking place. I find the NCSG agenda 
>>> is usually a bit more open, and NCUC agenda often pretty packed.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>> On 18 Aug 2017, at 7:48 am, Jeremy Malcolm <jmalcolm at eff.org 
>>>> <mailto:jmalcolm at eff.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> EFF has just posted its thoughts on the GoDaddy and Google 
>>>> termination of the Daily Stormer's domain:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2017/08/fighting-neo-nazis-future-fre
>>>> e-expression
>>>>
>>>> This would be a timely topic to address in more detail at ICANN 60.
>>>> I will be attending and would like to be able to find some time to 
>>>> talk about this and also about the recent EFF and Public Knowledge 
>>>> whitepaper "Which Internet registries offer the best protection for 
>>>> domain owners?
>>>> <https://www.eff.org/wp/which-internet-registries-offer-best-protection-domain-owners>".
>>>>
>>>> What are the avenues for holding such a presentation?  Is there 
>>>> already a block of time for NCSG where this would fit in, or should 
>>>> a separate session be requested?  If so can anyone point me to the 
>>>> information about how to do this?  Sorry, I'm a little behind on 
>>>> the logistics of ICANN meetings because I seldom attend in person.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeremy Malcolm
>>>> Senior Global Policy Analyst
>>>> Electronic Frontier Foundation
>>>> https://eff.org
>>>> jmalcolm at eff.org
>>>>
>>>> Tel: 415.436.9333 ext 161
>>>>
>>>> :: Defending Your Rights in the Digital World ::
>>>>
>>>> Public key: https://www.eff.org/files/2016/11/27/key_jmalcolm.txt
>>>> PGP fingerprint: 75D2 4C0D 35EA EA2F 8CA8 8F79 4911 EC4A EDDF 1122 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>

_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list