[NCUC-DISCUSS] Questions on ncuc bylaws

William Drake william.drake at uzh.ch
Sat Oct 15 10:54:59 CEST 2016


Hi

James is right, the NCUC process is necessarily separate from any NCSG process we might choose to undertake in the future.

Best

Bill


> On Oct 15, 2016, at 10:19, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> 
> I disagree, the process for revising the two sets of bylaws are separate, there are linkages of course but I think we do need to keep these decoupled.
> 
> -James
> 
> From: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Karel Douglas <douglaskarel at gmail.com <mailto:douglaskarel at gmail.com>>
> Date: Saturday 15 October 2016 at 03:20
> To: Carlos Vera <cveraq at gmail.com <mailto:cveraq at gmail.com>>
> Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Questions on ncuc bylaws
> 
> By-laws are the rules by which we conduct our affairs. Hence yes I agree. however it must be carefully drafted to avoid ambiguity. Re the syncing - that can be achieved thru joint WG (NCUC and NCSG) so that amendments are discussed and  happen concurrently.
> 
> regards
> 
> Karel DOUGLAS
> 
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Carlos Vera <cveraq at gmail.com <mailto:cveraq at gmail.com>> wrote:
> The more concrete the bylaws are, the best it works. 
> Discretion in the rules always cause lack kf transparency. 
> 
> May‎ I suggest a methodology to provide a 3-column table in which the original text, the proposed text and comments to be placed.
> 
> Carlos Vera 
> Ecuador
> De: farzaneh badii
> Enviado: viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016 00:05
> Para: NCUC-discuss
> Asunto: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Questions on ncuc bylaws
> 
> All
> 
> EC will meet today in a couple of hours to discuss questions and comments on the NCUC  bylaws.  Please consider discussing the questions below. We will have the public meeting with ncuc members on Monday next week.  
> Questions:
> 1. Should the bylaws include the process of removal of ncuc officers such as EC members and how?
> 
> 2. Should the bylaws predict processes for participating in empowered community and how?
> 
> 3. Changes are made to the ncuc bylaws to align it with ncsg bylaws. Since ncsg is going to go under bylaws reviews what should be done if ncsg bylaws again disalign with ncuc in some respects?
> 
> you can also share any issue/question you would like to add for discussion.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Farzaneh 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161015/7c849a7f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list