[NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Nadira,

It was kind of polling to get members preferences   and sense what they can
support. in this case, option 3 get a more support. it is also not a real
policy matter but more about getting some input and feedback.

Best,

Rafik


On Dec 1, 2016 9:00 PM, "Nadira Alaraj" <nadira.araj at gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks Ayden for summarising this email thread.
A decision to be made asap because the RightsCon deadline as you wrote is
on Dec 5th.

How the decisions are made on NCUC when there is no working committee on
this issue to provide their recommendation to the group members?

On 1 Dec 2016 13:09, "Ayden Férdeline" <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Greetings all,
> Just to summarise this thread; at the moment, we have five proposals:
>
> *1. Jurisdictional issues and domain name administration*
> Supported by Avri Doria, Louise Marie Hurel
>
> *2. Adopting multistakeholder processes on the Internet: the case of ICANN*
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Aicha
> Chebbi, Ines Hfaiedh, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>
> *3. Content regulation and private ordering at Internet governance
> institutions*
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Stefania
> Milan, Michael Oghia, Milton Mueller, Louise Marie Hurel, Ines Hfaiedh,
> Huthaifa Albustanji, Kabir GZ, Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>
> *4. State and future of the Registration Directory Service*
> Supported by Ayden Férdeline, Amal Al-saqqaf, Tatiana Tropina, Michael
> Oghia
>
> *5. Volunteers in non-commercial groups*
> Supported by Carlos Vera, Aicha Chebbi
>
> Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 are identifying a problem and mapping out the
> challenges, whereas proposal 4 is more outcome orientated, looking to
> create solutions to solve an issue.
>
> Thus far, proposal 3 has attracted more expressions of support on the list
> than the other topics have (but this email thread was not a referendum).
>
> The deadline for RightsCon proposals is this Monday.
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
> Local Time: 28 November 2016 12:38 PM
> UTC Time: 28 November 2016 12:38
> From: james at cyberinvasion.net
> To: Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>, farzaneh badii <
> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>
>
> Most certainly not, we spent many months in the accountability group
> making sure that we now have strong commitments in the ICANN bylaws against
> this. And we will fight any attempt to circumvent that through other means.
>
> -J
>
>
> *From: *Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of
> Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday 28 November 2016 at 12:32
> *To: *farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Proposals for Rightscon
>
> While the conversation of ICANN in the process of implementing some of her
> policies and agreement could become a content regulator is also very
> interesting. There is high probability that some point almost become a
> content regulator.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20161201/1f629fbf/attachment-0002.html>