[NCUC-DISCUSS] [Info] Call for candidates for NCUC Delegate to the ICANN 2017 Nominating Committee

Norbert Klein nhklein at gmx.net
Mon Aug 1 05:59:10 CEST 2016


+1

supporting Bill - and those who also put forward positive arguments.


Norbert Klein, former member of the Nominating Committee (from NCUC)

Cambodia

=


On 8/1/2016 2:27 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> I too would like to support Bill, and encourage him to push them to 
> review the Nomcom rules.  On this subject, it is worth noting that 
> Nomcom veterans declare it to be such a process ( I would not know 
> first hand, never having served on it) that it is very worthwhile to 
> keep our rep there for two years, since it takes a whole year to find 
> your feet under the table.  We have done this in the past.  Having 
> said that, I do think folks who want to nominate/self nominate should 
> do so regardless of the strong show of support for Bill. We need to 
> keep interesting people in the process, and in the many and various 
> tasks required of us as NCSG.  This one is a really important one, as 
> we have only one spot and this is the group that selects half the 
> Board....
>
> Best
>
> Stephanie Perrin
>
>
> On 2016-07-31 13:43, Sonigitu Ekpe wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I put forward my support for Bill as stated by Prof. Wolf.
>>
>> Highly experienced Bill to continue the navigation of the ICANN 
>> network in favour of Non Commercial Users Constituency.
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>> Sonigitu
>>
>>
>> On 31 Jul 2016 6:21 p.m., "Remmy Nweke" <remmyn at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:remmyn at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks Avri for once again being in the champion of this
>>     alongside others.
>>
>>     Unfortunately, from my understanding, ICANN laws are reviewed
>>     every five years, that in the first instance shows that NomCom
>>     rules of engagement should have been reviewed this year or by
>>     next year max.
>>
>>     However, ICANN was reviewed last February 2016, just wondering
>>     how this escaped most of us.
>>
>>     I think what we may do is to first establish when exactly this
>>     review should occur, this year or next, depending if the review
>>     date must elapse before action is taken or proactively initiate
>>     the process to culminate into precise year of transition.
>>
>>     Our leadership is hereby called upon to take the necessary calls
>>     to initiate this process and stop this maginalisation with the
>>     leadership of NPOC now under Klaus Stoll. I am sure we should be
>>     able to gain some mileage and erase the injustice to NPOC.
>>
>>     Best of the day from Lagos and happy new week.
>>     Remmy
>>
>>
>>
>>     ____
>>     REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
>>     Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
>>     DigitalSENSE Africa Media [/Multiple-award winning medium/]
>>     (DigitalSENSE Business News
>>     <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
>>     <http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet
>>     <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
>>     Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction,
>>     Oshodi-Lagos
>>     M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>>     <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>>     Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>>     <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria%E2%80%8E>
>>     PC Summit 2016 <http://www.pcsummit.com.ng>, December 2-3
>>     @Federal Palace, Victoria Island, Lagos.
>>     _________________________________________________________________
>>     *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>>     attachments are confidential and may also be privileged
>>     information. It is intended only for the use of the named
>>     recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal responsibility for
>>     the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
>>     recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this
>>     document and do not disclose the contents of this document to any
>>     other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face court
>>     persecution.
>>
>>     On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 4:16 PM, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>
>>         I should have said, when the Nomcom is next reviewed, I hope
>>         people
>>         mention it.
>>
>>         We tried last year to convince the Board, but they said, no:
>>         wait until
>>         it is reviewed, restructured or otherwise fixed.
>>
>>
>>         Last nomcom review ended in 2012.  Is it time again yet?
>>
>>
>>         avri
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 31-Jul-16 11:09, avri doria wrote:
>>         > Hi,
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On 31-Jul-16 06:52, Edward Morris wrote:
>>         >> It should be noted that the CSG has three times the
>>         representation on the NomCom as does the NCSG. Our colleagues
>>         in NPOC continue to be denied a slot on the body, the only
>>         GNSO constituency treated in this manner. While making the
>>         fine short handed work of Bill and Brenden all the more
>>         impressive, the principle of equity with our commercial
>>         friends is one we need to insist on and should pursue with
>>         increased vigour as ICANN enters a new era.
>>         > yes.  good to see this brought up again.
>>         > i hope the people who spoke to those interviewing for the
>>         Nomcom review
>>         > brought this up to them.
>>         >
>>         > avri
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > ---
>>         > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>         software.
>>         > https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>         >
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>         > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>         <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>         > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>         ---
>>         This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>         software.
>>         https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>         Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>         http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160801/8d10c4b9/attachment.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list