[NCUC-DISCUSS] 2016 NomCom Feb-Mar Report Card

[Remmy Nweke]

Thanks Bill
For the initial report card sent out from your end and responses so far
given.

They help in know more about the workings of NomCom.

However, is there any reason specifically that you have to attach the final
copy and edit by Jey that we may need to pay attention to.

Weldone.

Remmy Nweke
@ITRealms

____
REMMY NWEKE,  Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd [*Multiple-award winning medium*]
(DigitalSENSE Business News
<http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
<http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>)
Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
<http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
<https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria‎>
NDSF 2016 June 2-3 @Digital Bridge Institute (DBI), (former NITEL Training
School) NITEL Road, Cappa - Oshodi, Lagos <http://www.dbieducation.org/>
_________________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 3:41 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi James
>
> On Apr 29, 2016, at 15:07, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
>
> Hey Bill,
> Can you elaborate on the following:
>
> OB-F will share with it the headlines of their battery of questions, but
> not the questions themselves, let alone the answers.
>
>
> What is the reasoning behind the non sharing of the interview questions?
>
> The main rationale offered is that on a number of occasions people who
> served on the NomCom have subsequently become candidates for NC
> appointments themselves, so not sharing the questions with the NomCom
> prevents such folks from having an unfair advantage.  NomCom processes are
> pretty scrupulous about such things, and indeed OB destroys the responses
> to the 48 questions at the end of the cycle and keeps only the names of the
> people involved in the interview.  Bear in mind too that OB’s work is just
> an additional source of input, the analysis that matters is that of the
> NomCom after it conducts its own interviews and deep dives etc.  Probably
> this input is most relevant when OB’s results paint a different picture
> than the committee's, in which case there’d be reason to pause and consider
> the discrepancy etc.
>
> I say this ex ante, as I don’t have experience with the OB process yet.
> Others here who’ve been on past NomComs, e.g. Wolfgang who’s chaired and
> Brenden who was our rep the previous two years, could probably shed more
> light on how it works and how valuable it is.
>
> Best
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20160430/78029304/attachment-0002.html>