[NCUC-DISCUSS] [info] Draft New ICANN Bylaws Posted for Public Comment

[Seth Johnson]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:51 PM, avri doria <avri at apc.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The overall plan was reviewed, approved and sent on to NTIA for their
> approval.

And you are saying that this included the public comments period for
the whole, right?  And that was in the form of approval by the various
groups involved in developing it, with public comments treated as part
of the groups' reviews, right?


> Now the implementation of the bylaws is done and being reviewed for
> consistency with the plan.
> This is part of the work that needs to be done before NTIA can approve
> the transition.
>
> And it was a promise from the Board that the Accountability changes
> would go through before and regardless of the rest of the transition
> being finally approved by the US Gov't.
>
> I expect thee will be further reviews, such as with the operating
> procedures for the IRP that still need to be worked out.


As another subgroup process, I take it, treated as a public review process.


> Having 100/230 pages left to read, I must say I am impressed at how
> consistent the bylaws seem with the plan.


Good to hear that.


> avri
>
> On 23-Apr-16 21:02, Seth Johnson wrote:
>> Okay, thought getting the bylaws written was the last piece of the
>> whole, so now it's ready for public review.  Will there then be a PC
>> on the whole?  Or is it as if the public review requirements have
>> already been met by the piece-by-piece process and the lawyers are
>> just doing a technical implementation that won't need PC?
>>
>>
>> Seth
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:26 PM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
>>> No that public comment periods took place over the last few months, this one is a very specific public comment period on the bylaws and not the overall work product.  It may seem minor buts its an important distinction. The scope of this PC is extremely narrow and limited.
>>>
>>> -J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/04/2016, 23:27, "Ncuc-discuss on behalf of Seth Johnson" <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org on behalf of seth.p.johnson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's the phase where a work product
>>>> of a group of groups has been supposedly completed and issued for
>>>> public consideration.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss