[NCUC-DISCUSS] Candidate Statement

Norbert Klein nhklein at gmx.net
Sun Nov 22 03:37:23 CET 2015


+1

Norbert Klein
Cambodia



On 11/19/2015 08:32 PM, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I may be a boring old process stickler for a moment: while everyone
> likes funny statements etc., it actually would be helpful if
> candidates for NCUC positions would submit statements that respond to
> the agreed questions rather than writing free form essays.  There’s a
> reason we’ve used these questions for years; they ask for specific
> responses to important issues, and they allow voters to easily compare
> and contrast candidates’ views and records.  In writing free essays,
> someone might inadvertently overlook some of them and thus not provide
> members with information that can help them make informed choices.  So
> I repeat the questions once again in the hope that going forward we
> can return to our standard practice in the conduct of elections.
>
>
> 1. Why do you want to serve on the EC?
>
> 2. Provide a brief biography of recent experience, associations, and
> affiliations relevant to serving on the Executive Committee. Describe
> the relevance of your personal and professional experience to serve on
> the NCUC Executive Committee, and identify any conflicts of interests
> you might have.
>
> 3. The EC performs several functional responsibilities for the
> Constituency.  What  level of time commitment can you bring to your EC
> role on a weekly and overall basis?  Describe any concerns or
> limitations on your ability to attend online meetings of the Executive
> Committee and ICANN Meetings in person. 
>
> 4. Communication with the membership is critical. How would you keep
> members apprised of your EC-related activities?
>
> 5. How do you foresee NCUC’s function, scale, or role changing in the
> future? What areas of ICANN policy, if any, need more attention and why?  
>
> Incumbent candidates should answer in a manner that is both backward
> and forward looking, i.e. taking note of their contributions and work
> in the previous year.
>
> People should address each of these points, including the last one.
> The statements should be relatively concise, e.g. a paragraph or two
> per question.  
>
> Thanks
>
> Bill
>
>
> *********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
> william.drake at uzh.ch
> <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com
> <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
>   www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
> /Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap /http://goo.gl/sRR01q
> *********************************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20151122/cf3ff34b/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list