[NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC

[Mueller, Milton L]

Ben, Seun, James, Ed and Kathy

It looks like everyone agrees that we need to tackle the issues I have been raising. Please note that I have been pro-active in raising them. This has not been forced on me, I was the one initiating the action here and bringing these issues to the constituency’s attention. I consider this an extension of the kind of commitment that led me to insist on the creation of an independent NCUC in the first place. I don’t want the status quo to continue, and it has in the last year become obvious that if I don’t initiate action then it’s unlikely anything will change. It’s time to get this done, and being on the EC dramatically improves the prospect of this getting done. The EC needs someone on it with direct, long-term knowledge of the situation, the ability to act on it, awareness of the options, the consequences of various options, etc.

So the agenda is clear, let’s go into the elections with that in mind.

--MM

From: Ncuc-discuss [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin Akinmoyeje
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 4:10 AM
To: James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC

First off, I appreciate the work the Prof has done for 16 years, so I publicly announced that I am one of those knocking at his door to join the race, though I am not from the NA region nor physically present at his door to knock it.

He has built trust from the historical knowledge and delivered his functions all this while.
But as it was said NCUC is not legally an organization yet, we need to fix that and he is well positioned to help fix that now.

My suggestion to all is for us to look at the critical issues that will allow the change to happen.
We need to get NCUC become a legal entity that the banking system can recognize and hence we can set up what ever system, Treasurer - secretary or  Treasurer.

Thanks Bill for calling our attention to the bylaws, I would have gone ahead with the process without blinking an eyelid, but now I am more enlightened about the bylaws, 16 years history of NCUC , trust for the prof. and why I should vote in NCUC elections.


Thank you,
Benjamin

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:21 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net<mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
That’s the whole problem though, NCUC does not exist as an organisation therefore we don’t have an organisational bank account so its impossible to do so.

-James

From: Ncuc-discuss <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com<mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday 10 November 2015 at 12:49 a.m.
To: Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info<mailto:ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>>
Cc: NCUC-discuss <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>>
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Acceptance of nomination for NCUC EC


Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 10 Nov 2015 00:28, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info<mailto:ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>> wrote:
>
> On Nov 10 07:51, Andrew A. Adams (aaa at meiji.ac.jp<mailto:aaa at meiji.ac.jp>) wrote:
>
>
>
> But we really should have at least two people who can access the
> account.

SO:

I don't think this should require much convincing to be agreed upon. Having 2 account signatories is just a normal organisation standard.

Regards

_______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20151110/6ba08db6/attachment-0002.html>