[NCUC-DISCUSS] priorities

[Shahzad Ahmad]

Agreed Matthew. We must develop a statement from NCUC.

Best wishes
Shahzad


On 5/14/15 3:35 AM, Matthew Shears wrote:
> Thanks Bill.
>
> I really encourage everyone to sign on.  We need to ensure that the
> final stages of the WSIS+10 review remain as open to stakeholder
> engagement as possible.
>
> I would be very supportive of a statement from NCUC to this effect also.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 5/13/2015 4:13 PM, William Drake wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Having the UN General Assembly review the WSIS+10 in a purely
>> intergovernmental setting entails some real risks, and
>> nongovernmental stakeholders really need to take what opportunities
>> to weigh in the TBD ‘modalities’ of the preparatory process allow.
>>
>> This is a really important issue that we have discussed in the public
>> Internet governance sessions at the Los Angeles and Singapore
>> meetings, and we will so do so again in Buenos Aires. We’ve also
>> discussed it a number of times in the CCW on Internet governance,
>> alas thus far without getting consensus on submitting a statement.
>>
>> So I’m very happy to see ISOC moving forward and hope this gets
>> individual/organizational member support. If there were also interest
>> in supporting it at the constituency or stakeholder group level I’d
>> think that’d be worth discussing.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>> On May 13, 2015, at 9:41 PM, konstantinos at komaitis.org
>>> <mailto:konstantinos at komaitis.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
>>> The Internet Society has put together a letter calling for an Open
>>> WSIS+10 preparatory process. The letter is addressed to the
>>> President of the UN General Assembly and it is now online at
>>>
>>> https://www.openwsis2015.org/signatories/
>>>
>>> The first round of consultations for WSIS+10 should take place the
>>> week of the 8th of June, in New York. We hope that with this letter,
>>> the process that will follow will include all relevant stakeholders
>>> vs. governments only.
>>>
>>> I hope you consider signing on to the letter.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> KK
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2015-05-13 11:48, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>>
>>>> I see the very same gap, DeeDee. It would be nice if Freedom of
>>>> Expression and Free Speech groups were represented...
>>>> Best,
>>>> Kathy
>>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2015 11:26 AM, DeeDee Halleck wrote:
>>>>> watching Congress discuss ICANN
>>>>> the hearings today make it clear what is the priority list for
>>>>> Congressional concern:
>>>>> Top of the list: copyright protection
>>>>> next: security, law enforcement
>>>>> no mention of open access, protection of communication rights,
>>>>> human rights.
>>>>> xx
>>>>> dd
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org
>>>>> <http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org  <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>> *********************************************************
>> William J. Drake
>> International Fellow & Lecturer
>>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
>> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
>> william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct),
>> wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
>> www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
>> /Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap /http://goo.gl/sRR01q
>> *********************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150514/6d8196d6/attachment-0002.html>