[NCUC-DISCUSS] priorities

[Matthew Shears]

Thanks Bill.

I really encourage everyone to sign on.  We need to ensure that the 
final stages of the WSIS+10 review remain as open to stakeholder 
engagement as possible.

I would be very supportive of a statement from NCUC to this effect also.

Matthew

On 5/13/2015 4:13 PM, William Drake wrote:
> Hi
>
> Having the UN General Assembly review the WSIS+10 in a purely 
> intergovernmental setting entails some real risks, and nongovernmental 
> stakeholders really need to take what opportunities to weigh in the 
> TBD ‘modalities’ of the preparatory process allow.
>
> This is a really important issue that we have discussed in the public 
> Internet governance sessions at the Los Angeles and Singapore 
> meetings, and we will so do so again in Buenos Aires. We’ve also 
> discussed it a number of times in the CCW on Internet governance, alas 
> thus far without getting consensus on submitting a statement.
>
> So I’m very happy to see ISOC moving forward and hope this gets 
> individual/organizational member support. If there were also interest 
> in supporting it at the constituency or stakeholder group level I’d 
> think that’d be worth discussing.
>
> Bill
>
>
>> On May 13, 2015, at 9:41 PM, konstantinos at komaitis.org 
>> <mailto:konstantinos at komaitis.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all
>>
>> The Internet Society has put together a letter calling for an Open 
>> WSIS+10 preparatory process. The letter is addressed to the President 
>> of the UN General Assembly and it is now online at
>>
>> https://www.openwsis2015.org/signatories/
>>
>> The first round of consultations for WSIS+10 should take place the 
>> week of the 8th of June, in New York. We hope that with this letter, 
>> the process that will follow will include all relevant stakeholders 
>> vs. governments only.
>>
>> I hope you consider signing on to the letter.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> KK
>>
>>
>> On 2015-05-13 11:48, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>
>>> I see the very same gap, DeeDee. It would be nice if Freedom of 
>>> Expression and Free Speech groups were represented...
>>> Best,
>>> Kathy
>>>
>>> On 5/13/2015 11:26 AM, DeeDee Halleck wrote:
>>>> watching Congress discuss ICANN
>>>> the hearings today make it clear what is the priority list for 
>>>> Congressional concern:
>>>> Top of the list: copyright protection
>>>> next: security, law enforcement
>>>> no mention of open access, protection of communication rights, 
>>>> human rights.
>>>> xx
>>>> dd
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org 
>>>> <http://www.deepdishwavesofchange.org/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org  <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> *********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
>   Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>   University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>   ICANN, www.ncuc.org <http://www.ncuc.org>
> william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch> (direct), 
> wjdrake at gmail.com <mailto:wjdrake at gmail.com> (lists),
> www.williamdrake.org <http://www.williamdrake.org>
> /Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap /http://goo.gl/sRR01q
> *********************************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-- 
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 (0)771 247 2987

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150513/336660df/attachment-0002.html>