[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?

[Sonigitu Ekpe]

Dear Kathy

Nations have adopted the set of human rights, but is it applicable to all
nations items of implementation? The benefits of developed Countries do not
spread across under develop, yet we live in the same World.

So working closely with like-minded countries towards the achievement of
these priorities will be key to transparency and accountability.

ICANN should be able to involve all nations for a harmonized policy to fit
into the global settings. This can be done through bottom-up approach.

Hope this answers your question.


Sonigitu Ekpe

Mobile +234 805 0232 469    Office + 234 802 751 0179
 "LIFE is all about love and thanksgiving"


On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
wrote:

>  Hi Sonigitu,
> Could you kindly discuss what equality of engagement among Nations means?
> I can think of multiple definitions...
>
> I note this addition seems different from the set of human rights that
> nations have come together to adopt and further.
> Best and tx,
> Kathy
>
> :
>
>  Hello Bill,
>
>  I do support Kathy's view and this is my slight amendment in the
> inclusion she wrote about
> "Human Rights and equality of engagement among Nations" into the analysis
> of policy and issues in which ICANN is involved.
>
>  Thank you.
>
>  Sonigitu Ekpe
>
> Mobile +234 805 0232 469    Office + 234 802 751 0179
>  "LIFE is all about love and thanksgiving"
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Milan, Stefania <Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>
> wrote:
>
>>  Me too! (More) transparency, then, would be another thing to wish for!
>> Stefania
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 25/gen/2015, at 19:10, "Balleste, Roy" <rballeste at stu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>   Me too!!!
>>
>>
>>  Roy
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <
>> ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> on behalf of Avri Doria <
>> avri at acm.org>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:51 PM
>> *To:* ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: What would "good" look like to you
>> for ICANN in 2015?
>>
>>
>> please add my strong support for that.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 24-Jan-15 14:36, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bill,
>> I think you should include that "good" for ICANN in 2015 would involve
>> inclusion of Human Rights into the analysis of policy and issues in which
>> ICANN is involved.
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>      _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
>> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
>> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
>> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
>> material from any computer.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing listNcuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.orghttp://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150126/646a9cd8/attachment-0002.html>