[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: What would "good" look like to you for ICANN in 2015?

Kathy Kleiman kathy at kathykleiman.com
Mon Jan 26 01:03:50 CET 2015


Hi Sonigitu,
Could you kindly discuss what equality of engagement among Nations 
means?  I can think of multiple definitions...

I note this addition seems different from the set of human rights that 
nations have come together to adopt and further.
Best and tx,
Kathy

:
> Hello Bill,
>
> I do support Kathy's view and this is my slight amendment in the 
> inclusion she wrote about
> "Human Rights and equality of engagement among Nations" into the 
> analysis of policy and issues in which ICANN is involved.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sonigitu Ekpe
>
> Mobile +234 805 0232 469    Office + 234 802 751 0179
>  "LIFE is all about love and thanksgiving"
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Milan, Stefania 
> <Stefania.Milan at eui.eu <mailto:Stefania.Milan at eui.eu>> wrote:
>
>     Me too! (More) transparency, then, would be another thing to wish for!
>     Stefania
>
>     Sent from my iPhone
>
>     On 25/gen/2015, at 19:10, "Balleste, Roy" <rballeste at stu.edu
>     <mailto:rballeste at stu.edu>> wrote:
>
>>     Me too!!!
>>
>>
>>     Roy
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     *From:* ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org
>>     <mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>
>>     <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org
>>     <mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>> on behalf of Avri
>>     Doria <avri at acm.org <mailto:avri at acm.org>>
>>     *Sent:* Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:51 PM
>>     *To:* ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>     <mailto:ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>     *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: What would "good" look like to
>>     you for ICANN in 2015?
>>
>>     please add my strong support for that.
>>
>>     avri
>>
>>     On 24-Jan-15 14:36, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>>>     Hi Bill,
>>>     I think you should include that "good" for ICANN in 2015 would
>>>     involve inclusion of Human Rights into the analysis of policy
>>>     and issues in which ICANN is involved.
>>>     Best,
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>     The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
>     entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
>     and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
>     dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or
>     taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
>     or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited
>     without the express permission of the sender. If you received this
>     communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
>     material from any computer.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20150125/942d4522/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list