[NCUC-DISCUSS] Revising the NCUC Bylaws

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Fri Aug 14 08:07:34 CEST 2015


Hi,

There should be a version of the charter, as yet unapproved by anyone,
that is already close to being in line.

I have not tracked the versions for years, but it should still exist and
make the task easier.

good luck and thanks

avri


On 14-Aug-15 06:38, Arun Mohan Sukumar wrote:
> Hi, 
>
> To refresh this thread -  I would like to volunteer and help
> coordinate the effort to bring the NCUC charter in line with the NCSG
> one. That is hopefully a more modest task than any large scale
> revision, building on past efforts. 
>
> To start with, as Bill suggested, we could make a list of things
> needed to bring the our Charter with NCSG one - happy to send a draft
> over by next week.
>
> With the help of veterans in this exercise, may be we can do this in
> two months before Constituency Day?
>
> Arun
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
> <mailto:seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     Looks like compliance change will require update on bylaw
>     (charter) one way or the other.
>
>     Overall, I sense something has been done in the past, perhaps
>     taking things from there could help.
>
>     There is sure no need reinvent the wheel if a wheel has already
>     been invented.
>
>     Cheers!
>
>     On 9 Aug 2015 3:44 pm, "James Gannon" <james at cyberinvasion.net
>     <mailto:james at cyberinvasion.net>> wrote:
>
>         Agreed if there is a compliance change needed then so be it,
>         but that should be a separate effort and not rolled up into a
>         refocussing of the constituency via a bylaws revision IMO.
>
>         -James
>
>
>>         On 9 Aug 2015, at 15:34, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
>>         <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         When we mix the NCSG compliance issues with other desires, the
>>         discussion get confusing.  One we need to do, one we might
>>         want to do. 
>>         One is rather quick and easy, and one is possibly hopelessly
>>         complicated.
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>         Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>         http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>     Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
>     http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Head, Cyber Initiative
> Observer Research Foundation, New Delhi
> http://amsukumar.tumblr.com
> +91-9871943272
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list