[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the ICANN 2016 NominatingCommittee

[Subrenat, Jean-Jacques]

Dear Avri,

This discussion has made apparent, on the part of some members a call for better process, diversity, etc., on the other hand a desire to retain current procedures. This happens all the time, in all communities. Alongside others who, prior to me, had brought up such issues, I offered my 2-centimes' worth of comment.

Going through this thread again, I don't see a suggestion of "stifling" anything. Like any other member, I'll follow with interest the process as it unfolds.

Jean-Jacques.




----- Mail original -----
De: "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org>
À: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Août 2015 13:17:02
Objet: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Delegate to the ICANN	2016	NominatingCommittee



On 05-Aug-15 15:58, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
> - Best practices on selection procedures make clear that putting forward a name prior to an open call for candidates frequently has a deterrent effect on the willingness of some members to declare their candidacy, and may influence both the selection process and the final outcome.


Are you suggesting we should stifle such prior  support?

Isn't that how elections work, we all start talking about our candidates
and who is willing to take on a task before getting format about it.

I would be very much opposed to any actiion, formal or informal to
stifle discussion on this list.

avri

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss