[NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy policy

[Dan Krimm]

While my time constraints prevent me from being very active here
generally, this is an area where I have ongoing interests (with somewhat
lesser specific expertise), so I'd like to join any associated e-list if
only to monitor what's going on and learn/keep up to date.  Once in a
while I may be able to offer some tangible input.

This is becoming one of the more salient issues in the ICT policy space
generally these days, and I think (along with many others, obviously) it's
imperative that we get this right sooner than later.  Or at least as right
as possible...

Dan



On Wed, March 26, 2014 2:53 am, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> As long as you are not counting on me to institute tech platforms without
> help (I am a complete doofus at that stuff), I am ok either way.  I can
> see the merit of having a wikispace or shared platform to work on
> documents….I am not a google docs fan but if that is the preferred
> method so be it.
> Stephanie P (I think I will have to add the last initial to make sure the
> two stefs are distinguishable:-))
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:48 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> It’s great to see the enthusiasm for collaborating on this.  One
>> option is to keep it ad hoc and informal, and if that’s the preference
>> fine. But I’d also note that another would be to establish a standing
>> privacy Interest Group with a mail list etc.  We could of course do the
>> same for other issue-areas…for example, we had several expressions of
>> interest here in Singapore in something on IG4D.  We could create a
>> space on the website, e.g.
>> http://www.ncuc.org/participate/interest-groups with lists of members
>> and links to the mail lists, as per the administrative Working Teams
>> http://www.ncuc.org/participate/working-teams/.
>>
>> We used to have some subject-area Interest Groups before, which were
>> instantiated in social networks on the previous Ning website.  Some were
>> reasonably active, some less so, but either way they allowed members
>> with shared interests to connect and collaborate as desired.  It’d be
>> great if we could reboot this sort of activity and put in place tech
>> platforms to facilitate them.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Milan, Stefania <Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Stephanie, I would like to join too!
>>> Stefania
>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>> Da: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org
>>> <ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> per conto di Grace Githaiga
>>> <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>
>>> Inviato: mercoledì 26 marzo 2014 10.01
>>> A: Stephanie Perrin; joy at apc.org
>>> Cc: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> Oggetto: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy policy
>>>
>>> Stephanie
>>> Count me in!
>>>
>>> From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:43:06 -0400
>>> To: joy at apc.org
>>> CC: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] ICANN privacy policy
>>>
>>> wonderful!  Please, newcomers, this is a great group to join if you are
>>> interested in privacy and human rights, we would love to have you
>>> aboard.    very little writing required, but plenty of opportunity to
>>> input your views and country experience.  Join in!!
>>> Stephanie Perrin
>>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:45 AM, joy <joy at apc.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi - I am also happy to work on this.
>>> Joy
>>> On 26/03/2014 6:59 p.m., Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>>> I will certainly volunteer to provide the first draft of a commentary
>>> on the “privacy policy”.  I believe I am already on the hook for
>>> that, and if folks can self identify if they have an interest in this
>>> area, we can call it a group and I will send out the marked up copy.
>>> If people prefer to use a platform (e.g. googledocs) let us know.
>>> cheers Stephanie Perirn
>>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:43 AM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> We have a number of folks who work on privacy policy.  Would anyone be
>>> interested in organizing a group to provide an input to ICANN on its
>>> policy regarding the collection and use of personal data?
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
>>> Subject: RE: ICANN privacy policy
>>> Date: March 25, 2014 at 5:15:07 PM GMT+8
>>> To: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, "marie-laure Lemineur
>>> (mllemineur at gmail.com)" <mllemineur at gmail.com>, David Cake
>>> <dave at difference.com.au>, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell at gmail.com>,
>>> "magaly.pazello at gmail.com" <magaly.pazello at gmail.com>,
>>> "kdrstoll at gmail.com" <kdrstoll at gmail.com>, "Amr Elsadr
>>> (aelsadr at egyptig.org)" <aelsadr at egyptig.org>, Fadi Chehade
>>> <fadi.chehade at icann.org>, John Jeffrey <john.jeffrey at icann.org>
>>>
>>> Yes indeed - your addresses were just ones that I had to hand.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bruce Tonkin
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 25 March 2014 5:10 PM
>>> To: Bruce Tonkin
>>> Cc: Rafik Dammak; marie-laure Lemineur (mllemineur at gmail.com); David
>>> Cake; Maria Farrell;magaly.pazello at gmail.com; kdrstoll at gmail.com; Amr
>>> Elsadr (aelsadr at egyptig.org); Fadi Chehade; John Jeffrey
>>> Subject: Re: ICANN privacy policy
>>>
>>> Hi Bruce
>>>
>>> Thanks for this.  I assume this is an open invitation that we can share
>>> with our privacy mavens who are not not on the Cc, correct?
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Bill
>>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Bruce Tonkin
>>> <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> Regarding the discussion of ICANN's use of private information in the
>>> NCSG meeting with the Board today.
>>>
>>> With respect to ICANN's policy for collection and use of personal data,
>>> we do have a published privacy policy.
>>>
>>> See:  http://www.icann.org/en/help/privacy
>>>
>>> We would welcome a review of this policy to determine if it needs to be
>>> improved.   IT was last updated in Oct 2012.
>>>
>>> Also with respect to staff/HR information etc - I will see what
>>> information is available on internal policies.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bruce Tonkin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>> <joy.vcf>_______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ Ncuc-discuss mailing
>>> list Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>>
>>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
>>> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
>>> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>>> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
>>> this information by persons or entities other than the intended
>>> recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender.
>>> If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>> and delete the material from any computer.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>