[NCUC-DISCUSS] An example of how NCUC work matters

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

How about another letter.

To the GAC this time recommending they pay attention to what is being said.

avri


On 30-Jan-14 09:39, Walid AL-SAQAF wrote:
> Ditto! Very good observation indeed.
> Sincerely,
>
> Walid
>
> -----------------
>
> Walid Al-Saqaf
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:37 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was just reading Kevin Murphy’s piece on how the EU’s Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (i.e. the data commissioners) has again complained to ICANN that the RAA provisions on WHOIS are contrary to the European Data Protection Directive, and couldn’t help recalling that this trajectory began with a letter NCUC wrote to them a year and a half ago :-)
>>
>> http://www.ncuc.org/ARTICLE-29-WORKING-PARTY-OBJECTS-TO-LEA-WHOIS-PROPOSALS-IN-RAA-NEGOTIATIONS/
>>
>> http://domainincite.com/15680-eu-body-tells-icann-that-2013-raa-really-is-illegal
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> William J. Drake
>> International Fellow & Lecturer
>>    Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
>>    University of Zurich, Switzerland
>> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
>>    ICANN, www.ncuc.org
>> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
>>    www.williamdrake.org
>> ***********************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>