[NCUC-DISCUSS] An example of how NCUC work matters
Walid AL-SAQAF
wsaqaf at gmail.com
Thu Jan 30 15:39:06 CET 2014
Ditto! Very good observation indeed.
Sincerely,
Walid
-----------------
Walid Al-Saqaf
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:37 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was just reading Kevin Murphy’s piece on how the EU’s Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (i.e. the data commissioners) has again complained to ICANN that the RAA provisions on WHOIS are contrary to the European Data Protection Directive, and couldn’t help recalling that this trajectory began with a letter NCUC wrote to them a year and a half ago :-)
>
> http://www.ncuc.org/ARTICLE-29-WORKING-PARTY-OBJECTS-TO-LEA-WHOIS-PROPOSALS-IN-RAA-NEGOTIATIONS/
>
> http://domainincite.com/15680-eu-body-tells-icann-that-2013-raa-really-is-illegal
>
> Bill
>
> ***********************************************
> William J. Drake
> International Fellow & Lecturer
> Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
> University of Zurich, Switzerland
> Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
> ICANN, www.ncuc.org
> william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
> www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list