[NCUC-DISCUSS] Non Contracted Parties House Election Procedures 2011

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Fri Feb 14 05:07:22 CET 2014


Stentorious will do just as well....but sadly, it does seem like more than a few in the other constituencies are more than a bit deaf...:-)
cheers SP
On 2014-02-13, at 6:36 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:

> Strident usually works for me, as I am a bit deaf. :)
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> On 02/13/2014 08:34 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>> I certainly endorse you running.  Of course, you will have to be a bit strident to keep me happy ;-) 
>> cheers steph
>> On 2014-02-13, at 4:36 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 13-Feb-14 13:05, William Drake wrote:
>>>> Well, there is that…
>>>> 
>>>> So…what are we saying here?
>>> 
>>> By we, I think you mean me? Or rather "you" in the singular?
>>> 
>>> What I am saying is:
>>> -yes we should consider putting up a candidate against BillG for any number of reasons.
>>> - i am putting myself forward as a candidate for NCSG consideration (I know a selfie, a thing I like to avoid.)
>>> - if during consideration and analysis it seems like someone else is a better candidate, i am ok with that too.  i think replacing BillG is more important than my being on the Board.
>>> 
>>> If that is not what you meant, then you can ignore this message.
>>> 
>>> avri
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>> 




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list