[NCUC-DISCUSS] Non Contracted Parties House Election Procedures 2011
Carlos A. Afonso
ca at cafonso.ca
Fri Feb 14 00:36:01 CET 2014
Strident usually works for me, as I am a bit deaf. :)
--c.a.
On 02/13/2014 08:34 PM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> I certainly endorse you running. Of course, you will have to be a bit strident to keep me happy ;-)
> cheers steph
> On 2014-02-13, at 4:36 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 13-Feb-14 13:05, William Drake wrote:
>>> Well, there is that…
>>>
>>> So…what are we saying here?
>>
>> By we, I think you mean me? Or rather "you" in the singular?
>>
>> What I am saying is:
>> -yes we should consider putting up a candidate against BillG for any number of reasons.
>> - i am putting myself forward as a candidate for NCSG consideration (I know a selfie, a thing I like to avoid.)
>> - if during consideration and analysis it seems like someone else is a better candidate, i am ok with that too. i think replacing BillG is more important than my being on the Board.
>>
>> If that is not what you meant, then you can ignore this message.
>>
>> avri
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list