[NCUC-DISCUSS] Non Contracted Parties House Election Procedures 2011

[William Drake]

Hi

> On Feb 13, 2014, at 22:36, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 13-Feb-14 13:05, William Drake wrote:
>> Well, there is that…
>> 
>> So…what are we saying here?
> 
> By we, I think you mean me? Or rather "you" in the singular?
> 
> What I am saying is:
> -yes we should consider putting up a candidate against BillG for any number of reasons.
> - i am putting myself forward as a candidate for NCSG consideration (I know a selfie, a thing I like to avoid.)
> - if during consideration and analysis it seems like someone else is a better candidate, i am ok with that too.  i think replacing BillG is more important than my being on the Board.
> 
> If that is not what you meant, then you can ignore this message.

That is what I meant.

Happy to support again.  Luckily we have a bit of time to tee this up, lot of other things have to happen prior.

Bill