[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Resolutions from the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee held in Los Angeles on 5 Feb 2014

William Drake wjdrake at gmail.com
Sun Feb 9 09:56:17 CET 2014


Quite a lot of interesting NGPC acceptance of GAC advice in here….

Bill

Begin forwarded message:

> From: David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>
> Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Resolutions from the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee held in Los Angeles on 5 Feb 2014
> Date: February 9, 2014 at 7:16:00 AM GMT+1
> To: "soac-infoalert at icann.org" <soac-infoalert at icann.org>
> 
> 
>> 
>> From:  http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-05feb14-en.htm
>> 
>> 
>> Approved Resolutions | Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee
>> 
>> 
>> 5 February 2014
>> 
>> 
>> 1.  Main Agenda 
>> 
>>   a.  Remaining Items from Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC Advice: Updates and Actions Rationale for Resolution 2014.02.05.NG01
>> 
>>   b.  Discussion of Report on String Confusion Expert Determinations Rationale for Resolution 2014.02.05.NG02
>> 
>>   c.  Staff Update on Reassignment of Registry Agreements
>> 
>>   d.  Staff Update on Name Collision Framework
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 1.  Main Agenda:
>> 
>>   a.  Remaining Items from Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC Advice: Updates and Actions
>> 
>> Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 46 meeting in Beijing and issued a Communiqué on 11 April 2013 ("Beijing Communiqué").
>> 
>> Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 47 meeting in Durban and issued a Communiqué on 18 July 2013 ("Durban Communiqué").
>> 
>> Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 48 meeting in Buenos Aires and issued a Communiqué on 20 November 2013 ("Buenos Aires Communiqué").
>> 
>> Whereas, the NGPC adopted scorecards to respond to certain items of the GAC's advice in the Beijing Communiqué and the Durban Communiqué, which were adopted on 4 June 2013, 10 September 2013, and 28 September 2013.
>> 
>> Whereas, the NGPC has developed another iteration of the scorecard to respond to certain remaining items of GAC advice in the Beijing Communiqué and the Durban Communiqué, and new advice in the Buenos Aires Communiqué.
>> 
>> Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program.
>> 
>> Resolved (2014.02.05.NG01), the NGPC adopts the "GAC Advice (Beijing, Durban, Buenos Aires): Actions and Updates" (5 February 2014), attached as Annex 1 (http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-05feb14-en.pdf)  to this Resolution, in response to open items of Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC advice as presented in the scorecard.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   b.  Discussion of Report on String Confusion Expert Determinations
>> 
>> Whereas, on 10 October 2013 the Board Governance Committee (BGC) requested staff to draft a report for the NGPC on String Confusion Objections "setting out options for dealing with the situation raised within this Request, namely the differing outcomes of the String Confusion Objection Dispute Resolution process in similar disputes involving Amazon 's Applied-for String and TLDH's Applied-for String."
>> 
>> Whereas, the NGPC is considering potential paths forward to address the perceived inconsistent Expert Determinations from the New gTLD Program String Confusion Objections process, including implementing a review mechanism. The review will be limited to the String Confusion Objection Expert Determinations for .CAR/.CARS and .CAM/.COM.
>> 
>> Whereas, the proposed review mechanism, if implemented, would constitute a change to the current String Confusion Objection process in the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook.
>> 
>> Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program.
>> 
>> Resolved (2014.02.05.NG02), the NGPC directs the President and CEO, or his designee, to publish for public comment the proposed review mechanism for addressing perceived inconsistent Expert Determinations from the New gTLD Program String Confusion Objections process.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   c.   Staff Update on Reassignment of Registry Agreements
>> 
>> Item not considered.
>> 
>> 
>>   d.    Staff Update on Name Collision Framework
>> 
>> Item not considered.
>> 
>> 
>> Published on 7 February 2014
> _______________________________________________
> soac-infoalert mailing list
> soac-infoalert at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

***********************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140209/233cd9d7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1-05feb14-en.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 379653 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140209/233cd9d7/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140209/233cd9d7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list