[NCUC-DISCUSS] Increasing GAC influence?

[Edward Morris]

Thanks very much Avri.

I will get started on writing the first DIDP draft, in the hope others will 
join in support. I'm on the road the next few days, but certainly should 
have something ready by the end of the weekend. 

Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
To: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:13:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Increasing GAC influence?

hi,

On 19-Aug-14 16:34, Edward Morris wrote:
>
> I agree with Kathy and Milton and others who suggest we need to
> oppose this. I’d also like to ask the PC, at least PC members on
> this NCUC list,  to consider authorizing a DIDP on this. I’m happy to
> do the first draft if there is a desire to go forward. Two reasons to
> do so:
>
> 1. It would be nice to know the dynamics that have led to this
> proposal. Is there resistance on the Board? That would be useful to
> know as we plan our opposition;
>
> 2. We may even get some additional information. Most of the matter
> protected by the DCND doesn’t apply in this case. If staff and Board
> refuse to give us any information on matters concerning a change in
> the Bylaws, the most serious of all issues, it seriously strengthens
> our case that current transparency rules should in no way be confused
> with the FOIA standards suggested in the Thune / Rubio letter. They
> need to be strengthened.


While I do not oppose the change, I do support the DIDP.

avri
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20140819/0852b4df/attachment-0002.html>