[NCUC-DISCUSS] Increasing GAC influence?
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Wed Aug 20 00:13:15 CEST 2014
hi,
On 19-Aug-14 16:34, Edward Morris wrote:
>
> I agree with Kathy and Milton and others who suggest we need to
> oppose this. I’d also like to ask the PC, at least PC members on
> this NCUC list, to consider authorizing a DIDP on this. I’m happy to
> do the first draft if there is a desire to go forward. Two reasons to
> do so:
>
> 1. It would be nice to know the dynamics that have led to this
> proposal. Is there resistance on the Board? That would be useful to
> know as we plan our opposition;
>
> 2. We may even get some additional information. Most of the matter
> protected by the DCND doesn’t apply in this case. If staff and Board
> refuse to give us any information on matters concerning a change in
> the Bylaws, the most serious of all issues, it seriously strengthens
> our case that current transparency rules should in no way be confused
> with the FOIA standards suggested in the Thune / Rubio letter. They
> need to be strengthened.
While I do not oppose the change, I do support the DIDP.
avri
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list