[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fadi's strategy panels

[Jorge Amodio]

ICANN has a specific role and mission, it can evolve as an organization to fulfill its role but not extending it under the current structure to cover or take the leadership on matters for which the organization was not created.

Your salesman analogy does not apply here and does not make any sense on this context.

-Jorge

> On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Marc Perkel <marc at churchofreality.org> wrote:
> 
> In my other example where a salesman in the later 1970s becomes the head IT person in the mid 1990s because he was the first person at his company to buy a computer at Radio Shack wasn't in his job description as salesman.
> 
> I know some of you think ICANN is just names and numbers but I don't think that the future corresponds with the past. I think ICANN is going to evolve into it.
> 
> Agreed - it's not in the bylaws.
> 
> 
>> On 10/17/2013 3:49 PM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
>> 
>> Didn't finish writing the previous message ...
>> 
>> Nowhere in the Bylaws or Articles of Incorporation there is a mention to "Internet Governance," if we want to get on the IG arena we are obviously free to create a new organization with true membership and where we can have better representation and accountability.
>> 
>> I'm not discounting ICANN being part of the dialog, but Internet Governance is way off its mission and responsibilities, ergo ditto for its CEO.
>> 
>> Many of us could be interested to join this organization or not.
>> 
>> -J
> 
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss