[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fadi's strategy panels

[Milton L Mueller]

Ignore them, and they will go away. 

These panels not only have no legitimacy, there is really no clear explanation for why we need them and what they will do that meets a need defined by CANN's actual constituencies and communities. 

The idea that a group of 6 people led by someone who has never spent a minute in ICANN's process or in the formulation or analysis of DNS policy is going to make major reforms in process strikes me as especially ridiculous. 

--MM

-----Original Message-----
From: ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org [mailto:ncuc-discuss-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Amodio
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:06 AM
To: Avri Doria
Cc: ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fadi's strategy panels


I agree. Fadi is going way too far from his role as CEO

-Jorge

> On Oct 15, 2013, at 2:54 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> 
> i thought people volunteered and where chosen as individuals.
> 
> This is not  a proper ICANN multistakeholder process, this is a president's blue ribbon panel by a different name.
> 
> avri
> 
>> On 15 Oct 2013, at 15:02, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>> 
>> I wonder if people have been invited in their personal capacities (in 
>> which case I assume Icann will foot the bill) or as reps of their 
>> organizations/constituencies?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss