[NCUC-DISCUSS] NCUC Election 2013

[Tapani Tarvainen]

On Nov 08 22:56, Amr Elsadr (aelsadr at egyptig.org) wrote:

> You make an interesting point, Brenden. I think it is worth
> discussing. Personally, I have found that endorsements and +1s are
> more the result of individual insights into a candidate’s ability to
> perform the duties for which he/she is nominated for, and not
> because of the candidate statement.

Agreed.

> Perhaps future elections could have a different scheduling with time
> between when nominations end and statements are provided for
> endorsements and such in order to avoid discouraging potential
> candidates.

Perhaps. That's one thing to keep in mind when revising the Bylaws.
I'll add it to the list at http://pad.ncuc.org/p/bylaws
(which is open to all, btw).

> However, for this election, voting starts on the next day following
> the deadline to submit candidate statements leaving no time for
> endorsements and +1s.

Exactly.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss