[NCSG-Discuss] NCSG members and the closed generic issue

[Avri Doria]

Hi,


> nasty closed generics
> vitriol.

hmm.

But, yes, I never thought it would convince you.  And never in my wildest dreams did I ever think you would sign on as part of this group.

And I probably should have said:

"will people who agree with this positon be more inclined to perhaps maybe please sign on, if it is changed?"

thanks

avri


On 5 Mar 2013, at 09:46, Kathy Kleiman wrote:

> Why?  It does not change the positions of the letter (favoring nasty closed generics). But it does change the debate to something more respectful and less vitriol.  Not a reason to sign on - but a reason to support the process of disagreement...
> 
> Kathy
> 
>> Seems a good suggestion to me.
>> 
>> will people sign on if it is changed?
>> 
>> avri