[NCSG-Discuss] NCSG members and the closed generic issue

Kathy Kleiman kathy at KATHYKLEIMAN.COM
Tue Mar 5 04:07:22 CET 2013


+1, 2 and 3.
Kathy

:
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>> Dear NCSG members:
>>
>> A group of us, including so far Robin Gross, Avri Doria, Andrew 
>> Adams, Nicolas Adam and Brenden Kuerbis, have developed a comment 
>> with ICANN on the closed generic issue.
>> You can read our comments at this Google docs link: 
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tPuEELJ2y6-d0hwF_qPupQb0V5OEFpqkMwcApDRNZf0/edit?usp=sharing
>> We can still add names to the list of supporters, or you could file a 
>> quick and easy individual comment with ICANN expressing your support 
>> for the statement after it comes out.
>
> hi Milton and other signers of the document.
>
> i am disturbed by the title of the proposed submission as it implies an
> endorsement of the NCSG.
>
> in reading the content of the document, it also suggests this is the
> position held by a majority of NCSG stakeholders and fails to mention 
> that
> this issue has been one of the more lively topics on our mailing list 
> with
> contrasting/opposing views.  i especially find that the wording borders
> on "bullying" when you state that "we find these claims to be 
> hysterical..."
> i don't recall hysterical language being used by dissenting views posted
> on the mailing list.   i find the use of emotional language unpersuasive
> and unfitting in a position document.
>
> would it be impolite to ask that the title be changed and the content
> modified to limit the scope of general support/consensus implied on 
> the full membership of the NCSG?
>
> -ron wickersham



More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list