[NCSG-Discuss] GNSO applicants to the ATRT2 team
Alain Berranger
alain.berranger at GMAIL.COM
Tue Jan 29 16:23:17 CET 2013
Hi Bill and Avri,
Thanks for the clarification. NPOC will continue to support Avri And
Marie-Laure in their endeavors.
Alain
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It should be noted that the all of the candidates that applied will be
> considered by Steve & Heather when they are setting up the ATRT2. They may
> take the endorsement into account and they will be the ones reaching out to
> diversify and not care about whether the GNSO endorsed anyone else or not.
>
> avri
>
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2013, at 06:51, William Drake wrote:
>
> > Hi Alain
> >
> > The process agreed agreed June 2010
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/other/aoc-reviews is that
> >
> > "If the list does not meet the above mentioned diversity objectives, the
> Council as a whole may choose to endorse up to two additional candidates
> from the applicant pool who would help to give the list of GNSO nominees
> the desired balance. In this case, the Council would hold a vote during its
> teleconference, with sixty percent support of both houses represented in
> the Council being required for endorsement. If no candidate obtains that
> level of support, the list of endorsements obtained via the bottom-up
> process of stakeholder group nominations will be deemed final and forwarded
> to ICANN."
> >
> > So the additional nominees would be of the GNSO generally, not of the
> houses or SGs. The CPH stance was thus technically fine, just
> ill-considered.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Alain Berranger <alain.berranger at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Robin,
> >>
> >> Did not know it was an option for contracting parties to block
> non-contracted parties additional candidates. Is that the right
> interpretation? Did they also blocked additional candidates that would
> have added gender diversity?
> >>
> >> Alain
> >>
> >> On Monday, January 28, 2013, Robin Gross wrote:
> >> I am told that the contracting parties blocked all additional
> candidates that would have added some geo diversity to the group. That
> part is disappointing.
> >>
> >>
> >> Begin forwarded message:
> >>
> >>> From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
> >>> Date: January 27, 2013 12:49:41 PM PST
> >>> To: "Steve Crocker" <steve at shinkuro.com>, <Heather.Dryden at ic.gc.ca>, <
> jeannie.ellers at icann.org>
> >>> Cc: <council at gnso.icann.org>, <marilynscade at hotmail.com>, <
> krosette at cov.com>, "tony holmes" <tonyarholmes at btinternet.com>, "William
> Drake" <william.drake at uzh.ch>, <alain.berranger at gmail.com>, <
> robin at ipjustice.org>, "'KEITH DRAZEK'" <kdrazek at Verisign.com>, "Matt
> Serlin" <matt.serlin at markmonitor.com>
> >>> Subject: GNSO applicants to the ATRT2 team
> >>>
> >>> Dear Steve, Dear Heather,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please see attached letter regarding appointment of applicants arising
> from within the GNSO to the ATRT2 team.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank-you for giving this matter your attention.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan Robinson
> >>>
> >>> Chair
> >>>
> >>> ICANN GNSO Council
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com
> >>>
> >>> skype: jonathan.m.r
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
> >>
--
Alain Berranger, B.Eng, MBA
Member, Board of Directors, CECI,
http://www.ceci.ca<http://www.ceci.ca/en/about-ceci/team/board-of-directors/>
Executive-in-residence, Schulich School of Business, www.schulich.yorku.ca
Treasurer, Global Knowledge Partnership Foundation, www.gkpfoundation.org
NA representative, Chasquinet Foundation, www.chasquinet.org
Chair, NPOC, NCSG, ICANN, http://npoc.org/
O:+1 514 484 7824; M:+1 514 704 7824
Skype: alain.berranger
AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ
Ce courriel est confidentiel et est à l’usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus. Toute personne qui lit le présent message sans en être le
destinataire, ou l’employé(e) ou la personne responsable de le remettre au
destinataire, est par les présentes avisée qu’il lui est strictement
interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, de le modifier ou de le
reproduire, en tout ou en partie . Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
si ce document vous a été communiqué par erreur, veuillez nous en informer
sur le champ et détruire ce courriel et toute copie de celui-ci. Merci de
votre coopération.
CONFIDENTIALITY MESSAGE
This e-mail message is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use
of the addressee. Please note that, should this message be read by anyone
other than the addressee, his or her employee or the person responsible for
forwarding it to the addressee, it is strictly prohibited to disclose,
distribute, modify or reproduce the contents of this message, in whole or
in part. If the addressee cannot be reached or if you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify us immediately and delete this e-mail and
destroy all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20130129/44cf581d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list