[NCUC-DISCUSS] Registrants Rights and Responsibilities: let's propose a real alternative

[Robin Gross]

Yes Wendy, I agree.  Let's do it.

Robin

On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:37 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com> wrote:

> Fadi mentioned this document
> https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrant-rights-responsibilities-07mar13-en.pdf
> in his opening, and other Board members raised it again this evening.
> 
> We've characterized it as a toothless document. I suggest that we draft
> an alternative document, with REAL rights, including:
> 
> The rights to:
> * persistent neutral resolution of the registered domain
> * no suspension or termination of registration without due process
> * privacy options in the provision and display of registration data
> * fair and non-discriminatory treatment from registrars and registries
> * no censorship of domain use, content, or communications through
> registries or registrars
> * right to use the registered domain for any purpose
> 
> Responsibilities, including:
> * to be contactable, or to provide an alternative such as allowing the
> registrar to suspend registration on unresponded-to allegation of abuse
> * not to use the domain name for abuse of the DNS (to be defined more
> specifically: e.g., specific DNS attacks, deliberate malicious
> distribution of malware, or criminal activity)
> * not to cybersquat (already defined in UDRP)
> 
> To have the most impact, it would be great if we could get a statement
> together during the Beijing meeting, since the Board may well be asked
> to vote on the RAA by late April. Please feel free to add to the above.
> 
> --Wendy
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> 
_______________________________________________
Ncuc-discuss mailing list
Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss