Fwd: letter from the Article 29 Working Party to ICANN

[Nicolas Adam]

Well done Robin and Dave!

Nicolas

On 9/27/2012 9:46 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> This is great news!! Article 29 Working
> Party has sent a letter to ICANN to inform it that the proposed RAA
> amendments violate European Privacy laws.   This intervention is in
> response to the letter NCUC sent to privacy officials this summer.
>
> Best,
> Robin
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From:* "Nas, mw. drs. S. (CBP)" <s.nas at cbpweb.nl
>> <mailto:s.nas at cbpweb.nl>>
>> *Date:* September 27, 2012 3:15:22 AM PDT
>> *To:* "robin at ipjustice.org <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>"
>> <robin at ipjustice.org <mailto:robin at ipjustice.org>>,
>> "'dave at difference.com.au <mailto:dave at difference.com.au>'"
>> <dave at difference.com.au <mailto:dave at difference.com.au>>
>> *Cc:* CBP - sectie Internationaal <CBPint at CBPweb.nl
>> <mailto:CBPint at CBPweb.nl>>
>> *Subject:* *letter from the Article 29 Working Party to ICANN*
>>
>> Dear Robin, dear David,
>>
>> In response to your request from 1 August 2012 to the Article 29
>> Working Party regarding the revision of ICANN's contract with
>> registrars, the Working Party has indeed intervened with a letter,
>> sent yesterday, to the ICANN Board Chair and CEO.
>>
>> Please find the letter attached.
>>
>> I would be happy to hear from you, also in case of new developments
>> impacting on the privacy of people registering a domain name.
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Sjoera Nas, Dutch DPA
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120927/3f9572ff/attachment-0001.html>