[Ncu-exec] proposed statement for the IOC/IFRC DT resolution

[Norbert Klein]

+1

Norbert


On 9/27/2012 8:14 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> I support this statement, thanks Avri.
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org
> <mailto:avri at acm.org>> wrote:
>
>     The IOC/IFRC is claiming consensus on its proposal to suggest a
>     temporary registration block for the IOC and IFRC. This is the
>     statement I propose be added to the statement indicating the
>     disagreement of the NCSG with that proposal.
>
>     I request that the NCSG-PC endorse this statement.
>
>     -----
>
>     The NCSG rejects the 3b "temporary registration block." defined in
>     IOC/IFRC Drafting Team' recommendation for a number of reasons:
>
>     1. Policy recommendations from the GNSO on reserved names can only
>     be made by a PDP that is properly constituted and is run according
>     to the process rules as established in the ICANN by-laws.
>
>     2. This drafting team continues to circumvent proper process by
>     attempting to make policy as opposed to performing its proper
>     function of fact gathering and presenting information to the
>     council that can be used in deciding on the viability and charter
>     for such a PDP.
>
>     The NCSG supports the PDP only on the condition that among the
>     possible outcomes is the current status quo, no protection at the
>     second level. We support the PDP as the only appropriate place to
>     resolve this proposal among competing proposals. We believe it is
>     illegitimate to change reserved name policy,,,,, no matter how it
>     is euphemistically named, before the PDP runs its course.
>
>     The NCSG is also aware of other types of humanitarian organization
>     that also demand these privileges and we feel that any discussion
>     on granting such special reservations must include a full
>     discussion of all who request such reservations.
>
>     Finally the NCSG does not believe that the reserved name list can
>     be used solely for the purpose of new gTLDs, and that any
>     decisions on adding names to the reserved list must take incumbent
>     registries into account.
>
>
>     ------
>     Avri Doria
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ncu-exec mailing list
>     Ncu-exec at ipjustice.org <mailto:Ncu-exec at ipjustice.org>
>     http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120927/9682c3f4/attachment-0001.html>