<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">+1<br>
<br>
Norbert<br>
<br>
<br>
On 9/27/2012 8:14 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANwsP3ABtw8+8WK5mZJwYtrRv5cHALxh65zHuSrZOBKszAAgjw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">I support this statement, thanks Avri.<br>
<br clear="all">
---------------------------------------<br>
Brenden Kuerbis<br>
Internet Governance Project<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://internetgovernance.org"
target="_blank">http://internetgovernance.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Avri
Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>The IOC/IFRC is claiming consensus on its proposal to
suggest a temporary registration block for the IOC and IFRC.
This is the statement I propose be added to the statement
indicating the disagreement of the NCSG with that proposal.<br>
<br>
I request that the NCSG-PC endorse this statement.<br>
<br>
-----<br>
<br>
The NCSG rejects the 3b "temporary registration block."
defined in IOC/IFRC Drafting Team' recommendation for a
number of reasons:<br>
<br>
1. Policy recommendations from the GNSO on reserved names
can only be made by a PDP that is properly constituted and
is run according to the process rules as established in the
ICANN by-laws.<br>
<br>
2. This drafting team continues to circumvent proper process
by attempting to make policy as opposed to performing its
proper function of fact gathering and presenting information
to the council that can be used in deciding on the viability
and charter for such a PDP.<br>
<br>
The NCSG supports the PDP only on the condition that among
the possible outcomes is the current status quo, no
protection at the second level. We support the PDP as the
only appropriate place to resolve this proposal among
competing proposals. We believe it is illegitimate to change
reserved name policy,,,,, no matter how it is
euphemistically named, before the PDP runs its course. <br>
<br>
The NCSG is also aware of other types of humanitarian
organization that also demand these privileges and we feel
that any discussion on granting such special reservations
must include a full discussion of all who request such
reservations. <br>
<br>
Finally the NCSG does not believe that the reserved name
list can be used solely for the purpose of new gTLDs, and
that any decisions on adding names to the reserved list must
take incumbent registries into account.<br>
<br>
<br>
------<br>
Avri Doria</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ncu-exec mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Ncu-exec@ipjustice.org"
target="_blank">Ncu-exec@ipjustice.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec"
target="_blank">http://mailman.ipjustice.org/listinfo/ncu-exec</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>