Fwd: [liaison6c] Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures

Robin Gross robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG
Tue Oct 30 17:23:06 CET 2012


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: October 30, 2012 6:45:30 AM PDT
> To: liaison6c <liaison6c at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [liaison6c] Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's  
> Accountability Structures
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/asep- 
> recommendations-26oct12-en.htm
> Expert Recommended Improvements to ICANN's Accountability Structures
>
> Comment/Reply Periods (*)
> Important Information Links
> Comment Open:
> 26 October 2012
> Comment Close:
> 16 November 2012
> Close Time (UTC):
> 23:59 UTC
> Public Comment Announcement
> Reply Open:
> 17 November 2012
> To Submit Your Comments (Forum)
> Reply Close:
> 8 December 2012
> View Comments Submitted
> Close Time (UTC):
> 23:59 UTC
> Report of Public Comments
> Brief Overview
> Originating Organization:
> ICANN Board
> Categories/Tags:
> Transparency/Accountability
> Purpose (Brief):
> To receive comments on the recommended enhancements to ICANN's  
> Reconsideration Process and Independent Review Process provided by  
> the Accountability Structures Expert Panel (ASEP). The ASEP, that  
> was formed in fulfillment of the Accountability and Transparency  
> Review Team Recommendations 23 and 25, developed these  
> recommendations after a series of work sessions and discussions at  
> ICANN's public meeting in Toronto. ICANN is also providing draft  
> Bylaws revisions that would give effect to the ASEP's recommendations.
> Current Status:
> The ASEP Recommendations and corresponding proposed Bylaws  
> revisions are ready for community consideration and input.
> Next Steps:
> The community input will be provided to the ASEP to consider if  
> refinement is needed. The ASEP's recommendations and the community  
> input will be provided to the Board for consideration.
> Staff Contact:
> Samantha Eisner, Senior Counsel
> Email:
> Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
> Detailed Information
> Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose
> Recommendations 23 and 25 of the Accountability and Transparency  
> Review Team called for ICANN to convene a group of experts to  
> review ICANN's accountability structures, including the  
> Reconsideration Process and the Independent Review Process. In  
> response, ICANN convened the Accountability Structures Expert Panel  
> (ASEP). The ASEP is comprised of three international experts in the  
> fields of corporate governance, accountability, judicial review and  
> international dispute resolution.
>
> The ASEP has produced a report containing recommended enhancements  
> and refinements to ICANN's Reconsideration Process and Independent  
> Review Panel, with a focus on effectiveness, efficiency, ease of  
> access and expeditious resolution, as well as maintaining and  
> enhancing ICANN's accountability to the community and the global  
> public interest. Prior to issuing the report, the ASEP has  
> maintained an open comment period and interacted with the community  
> at ICANN's public meeting in Toronto.
>
> In the event that the ASEP's recommendations are accepted by the  
> Board, the ICANN Bylaws will have to be amended to give effect to  
> the recommendations. To that end, proposed Bylaws amendments are  
> also provide for community review and comment.
>
> Section II: Background
> ICANN's Reconsideration and Independent Review Processes have been  
> in place for a number of years. Information on the current  
> Reconsideration Process is available athttp://www.icann.org/en/ 
> groups/board/governance/reconsideration, and documentation of the  
> two Independent Review Processes to date is available at http:// 
> www.icann.org/en/news/irp.
> Section III: Document and Resource Links
> ICANN is seeking comment on the following documents:
>
> ASEP Report [PDF, 1.39 MB];
> Proposed Bylaws Revisions for the Reconsideration Process [PDF, 113  
> KB]; and
> Proposed Bylaws Revisions for the Independent Review Process [PDF,  
> 93 KB] and corresponding Cooperative Engagement Process for  
> Independent Review [PDF, 36 KB].
> Section IV: Additional Information
> None
>
> (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not  
> guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis,  
> reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period  
> lapses.
>
>
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121030/65fc21f6/attachment.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list