Fwd: [liaison6c] Protection of International Olympic Committee (IOC) / Red Cross Names (RCRC) Drafting Team - Recommendations
Robin Gross
robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG
Tue Oct 2 20:52:49 CEST 2012
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: October 1, 2012 3:17:26 PM PDT
> To: liaison6c <liaison6c at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [liaison6c] Protection of International Olympic Committee
> (IOC) / Red Cross Names (RCRC) Drafting Team - Recommendations
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/ioc-rcrc-
> recommendations-28sep12-en.htm
> Protection of International Olympic Committee (IOC) / Red Cross
> Names (RCRC) Drafting Team – Recommendations
>
> Comment/Reply Periods (*)
> Important Information Links
> Comment Open:
> 28 September 2012
> Comment Close:
> 19 October 2012
> Close Time (UTC):
> 23:59 UTC
> Public Comment Announcement
> Reply Open:
> 20 October 2012
> To Submit Your Comments (Forum)
> Reply Close:
> 9 November 2012
> View Comments Submitted
> Close Time (UTC):
> 23:59 UTC
> Report of Public Comments
> Brief Overview
> Originating Organization:
> GNSO
> Categories/Tags:
> Top-Level Domains
> Second-Level Domains
> Policy Process
> Intellectual Property
> Purpose (Brief):
> The IOC/RCRC Drafting Team (DT) requests community comment on the
> latest recommendations created for second level protections of
> names relating to the International Olympic Committee and the Red
> Cross/Red Crescent.
> Current Status:
> Open for Public Comment
> Next Steps:
> The Drafting Team's recommendations will be updated to reflect
> community feedback submitted through this forum and via final
> agreement of the Drafting Team members. Final recommendations will
> then be presented to the GNSO Council for its consideration.
> Staff Contact:
> Brian Peck, Margie Milam
> Email:
> Policy-staff at icann.org
> Detailed Information
> Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose
> As a result of IOC/RCRC being granted top level protections for the
> first round of the new gTLD program, the IOC/RCRC Drafting Team was
> further tasked to consider whether the same protections should be
> afforded at the second level prior to the first delegation of a new
> gTLD. Since the beginning of 2012, the IOC/RCRC Drafting Team (DT)
> has deliberated about possible second level protections and how to
> respond to the GAC's request for protections. The DT now submits
> the recommendations formulated by the DT and makes them available
> for public comment before final submission to the GNSO Council.
>
> Note from the IOC/RCRC Drafting Team Chair:
> These recommendations are being posted at the request of the
> Drafting Team. Although some members of the Drafting Team believe
> that a PDP is not necessary at this time to grant second level
> protections for the IOC/RCRC, a consensus of the DT does in fact
> agree that a PDP represents an appropriate compromise on this
> issue. With respect to the Recommendations #2 and #3 (temporary
> protection at second level), there is strong support amongst the
> Drafting Team for those recommendations with opposition from the
> Non-commercial Stakeholder Group and Thomas Rickert. A copy of
> statements from certain constituencies, stakeholder groups, and/or
> individuals is attached as appendices to the recommendations.
>
> Section II: Background
> The ICANN Board had requested policy advice from the GNSO Council
> and the GAC on whether special protections should be afforded to
> the RCRC, IOC and/or IGOs. Specifically, in its Singapore
> resolution, the Board authorized the President and CEO to implement
> the New gTLD Program "which includes the following elements: "the
> 30 May 2011 version of the Applicant Guidebook, subject to the
> revisions agreed to with the GAC on 19 June 2011, including: ...(b)
> incorporation of text concerning protection for specific requested
> Red Cross and IOC names for the top level only during the initial
> application round, until the GNSO and GAC develop policy advice
> based on the global public interest....."
>
> During September 2011, the GAC also sent advice to the GNSO with a
> proposal for granting second level protections based upon the
> protections afforded to IOC/RCRC at the first level. In the same
> month, section 2.2.1.2.3 was added to the latest version of the new
> gTLD Applicant Guidebook dated 19 September 2011.
>
> As a result of the GAC proposal submitted to the GNSO, the GNSO
> Council created a call for volunteers to form a drafting team about
> creating a response to the GAC. The IOC/RCRC Drafting Team was
> formed has since created a set of recommendations for protecting
> the IOC/RCRC names at the second level and includes an outline for
> a response to the GAC from the GNSO. The Drafting Team now wishes
> to solicit feedback from the community prior to submission of the
> recommendations to the GNSO Council.
>
> See the IOC/RCRC Drafting Team page for more detail at: http://
> gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/red-cross-ioc.htm
>
> Section III: Document and Resource Links
> IOC/RCRC Drafting Team Recommendations Report [PDF, 152 KB]
> Section IV: Additional Information
> None
>
> (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not
> guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis,
> reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period
> lapses.
>
>
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin at ipjustice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20121002/348ec1c3/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list