[council] Prague - please read!
Kristina Macaulay
kristinamac at MAC.COM
Sat May 12 08:33:14 CEST 2012
https://domainpolicy.org/
On May 11, 2012, at 08:00 PM, Joy Liddicoat <joy at APC.ORG> wrote:
> Hi all - passing this on - any suggestions would be welcome (though needed
> quickly) .Ideas I have already suggested include:
> how the GAC and GNSO can improve the joint working relationship? Are our
> processes for joint engagement on areas of mutual interest adequate - can
> they be improved? For example, would an informal joint standing committee of
> some kind be helpful? This could also be a topic for the GNO Council working
> session.
> For the ccNSO - discussion on how we can engage around areas of mutual
> interest such as developing policies for law enforcement requests
> Cheers
>
> Joy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Friday, 11 May 2012 8:06 p.m.
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Prague - please read!
>
>
> Councillors,
>
> I would like to strongly request your help in coming up with two things in
> preparation for our Prague week:
>
> 1. Topics for our interactions with the Board/GAC and ccNSO and 2. Ideas for
> sessions for our work weekend.
>
> As added context, I should say that the Council leadership is under greater
> pressure than usual to provide this earlier than usual (Staff have been put
> under pressure due to the delay in publishing the CR agenda that people
> complained about there).
>
> I should also add that I have asked Jeff, who has kindly volunteered (or was
> kindly volunteered by me, whichever way you want to see it ;) ) to look
> after our Prague agenda, to ensure that we cut down on pure working lunch
> sessions. I find these sessions are an organizational nightmare as people
> need time to have their lunch, which cost down on the time afforded to the
> topic we are scheduled to work on.
>
> So in short, please make a greater effort than usual to provide ideas for 1
> and 2 above. These sessions, both our interactions with other groups and our
> own working sessions, should be the result of Council-wide deliberations so
> that they are truly effective and have greater meaning for the Council as a
> whole.
>
> Thanks for your help in this endeavor.
>
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM Group NBT France
> ----------------
> Head of Domain Operations
> Group NBT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120512/a0950170/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list